digitalmars.D.announce - [OT] LLVM 3.9 released - you can try the release already with LDC!
- Kai Nacke (14/14) Sep 04 2016 Hi all!
- Emre Temelkuran (4/18) Sep 04 2016 K-A-I R-U-L-E-Z
- Kai Nacke (5/27) Sep 05 2016 Thanks! It is the LDC team which which rulez! I am just trying to
- eugene (2/4) Sep 06 2016 lol, how does it help?)))
- Lodovico Giaretta (8/14) Sep 06 2016 There are lot of projects using LLVM [1]. The fact that LDC if
- eugene (4/12) Sep 06 2016 i dont think counting each time when ldc and d are mentioned in
- =?iso-8859-1?Q?Robert_M._M=FCnch?= (6/8) Sep 07 2016 And now?
- eugene (3/4) Sep 07 2016 and now the same i think)))
- Kai Nacke (15/29) Sep 08 2016 News ticker often refer to the LLVM release notes. E.g. the Heise
- eugene (4/5) Sep 09 2016 What i do to advocate D is nothing, as D is not to be advocated
- Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce (6/14) Sep 09 2016 :D if that logic worked there would be no governments.
- Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce (7/36) Sep 09 2016 Its not childish at all, if you could show a chart of visits and downloa...
Hi all! LLVM 3.9 has been released! See the release notes here: http://www.llvm.org/releases/3.9.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Also note that LDC is mentioned in the release notes as the only external project who is already supporting LLVM 3.9: http://www.llvm.org/releases/3.9.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#ldc-the-llvm-based-d-compiler There are still surfacing some problems with LLVM 3.9, but you can try for yourself: Just recompile LDC using master or ltsmaster branch from GitHub to use this new LLVM release. This is the 9th time that LDC and D are mentioned in the LLVM release notes! Regards, Kai
Sep 04 2016
On Sunday, 4 September 2016 at 17:18:10 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:Hi all! LLVM 3.9 has been released! See the release notes here: http://www.llvm.org/releases/3.9.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Also note that LDC is mentioned in the release notes as the only external project who is already supporting LLVM 3.9: http://www.llvm.org/releases/3.9.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#ldc-the-llvm-based-d-compiler There are still surfacing some problems with LLVM 3.9, but you can try for yourself: Just recompile LDC using master or ltsmaster branch from GitHub to use this new LLVM release. This is the 9th time that LDC and D are mentioned in the LLVM release notes! Regards, KaiK-A-I R-U-L-E-Z K-A-I R-U-L-E-Z K-A-I R-U-L-E-Z
Sep 04 2016
On Monday, 5 September 2016 at 05:07:25 UTC, Emre Temelkuran wrote:On Sunday, 4 September 2016 at 17:18:10 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:Thanks! It is the LDC team which which rulez! I am just trying to advocate LDC and D a bit... KaiHi all! LLVM 3.9 has been released! See the release notes here: http://www.llvm.org/releases/3.9.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Also note that LDC is mentioned in the release notes as the only external project who is already supporting LLVM 3.9: http://www.llvm.org/releases/3.9.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#ldc-the-llvm-based-d-compiler There are still surfacing some problems with LLVM 3.9, but you can try for yourself: Just recompile LDC using master or ltsmaster branch from GitHub to use this new LLVM release. This is the 9th time that LDC and D are mentioned in the LLVM release notes! Regards, KaiK-A-I R-U-L-E-Z K-A-I R-U-L-E-Z K-A-I R-U-L-E-Z
Sep 05 2016
On Sunday, 4 September 2016 at 17:18:10 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:This is the 9th time that LDC and D are mentioned in the LLVM release notes!lol, how does it help?)))
Sep 06 2016
On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 at 09:21:06 UTC, eugene wrote:On Sunday, 4 September 2016 at 17:18:10 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:There are lot of projects using LLVM [1]. The fact that LDC if often cited in the release notes means that it's one of the best. This is free advertisement, as the LLVM release notes are read by PL people that may not know D. The fact that LDC is recognized as one of the most important LLVM projects also means that the LLVM folks will try to help the LDC folks when needed. [1] http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/This is the 9th time that LDC and D are mentioned in the LLVM release notes!lol, how does it help?)))
Sep 06 2016
On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 at 09:42:11 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote:There are lot of projects using LLVM [1]. The fact that LDC if often cited in the release notes means that it's one of the best. This is free advertisement, as the LLVM release notes are read by PL people that may not know D. The fact that LDC is recognized as one of the most important LLVM projects also means that the LLVM folks will try to help the LDC folks when needed. [1] http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/i dont think counting each time when ldc and d are mentioned in llvm community will help ldc and d to become popular)))
Sep 06 2016
On 2016-09-06 10:51:16 +0000, eugene said:i dont think counting each time when ldc and d are mentioned in llvm community will help ldc and d to become popular)))And now? -- Robert M. Münch http://www.saphirion.com smarter | better | faster
Sep 07 2016
On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 07:04:15 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:And now?and now the same i think)))
Sep 07 2016
On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 at 10:51:16 UTC, eugene wrote:On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 at 09:42:11 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote:News ticker often refer to the LLVM release notes. E.g. the Heise news ticker (http://www.heise.de/) always reports about a new LLVM release. But I never succeded to place a new LDC release into the ticker. It's simply a good way to more people and get some advertising. With every new LDC release I inform LLVM Weekly (http://llvmweekly.org/), too, which is a widely read news letter. From one of these source, news about LDC spread to other sites like phoronix (http://phoronix.com/). Maybe counting of each reference is a bit childish (but fun). The real question is: What do YOU do to advocate D? Regards, KaiThere are lot of projects using LLVM [1]. The fact that LDC if often cited in the release notes means that it's one of the best. This is free advertisement, as the LLVM release notes are read by PL people that may not know D. The fact that LDC is recognized as one of the most important LLVM projects also means that the LLVM folks will try to help the LDC folks when needed. [1] http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/i dont think counting each time when ldc and d are mentioned in llvm community will help ldc and d to become popular)))
Sep 08 2016
On Thursday, 8 September 2016 at 20:46:57 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:What do YOU do to advocate D?What i do to advocate D is nothing, as D is not to be advocated but to be useful as a programming language))) My idea is simple: if it is useful then people will use it.)))
Sep 09 2016
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:31 AM, eugene via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce puremagic.com> wrote:On Thursday, 8 September 2016 at 20:46:57 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote::D if that logic worked there would be no governments. Jokes aside, people do what they know, and are loath to change unless it shows high probability of them being able to survive in their group, or they believe they will be able to survive in another group.What do YOU do to advocate D?What i do to advocate D is nothing, as D is not to be advocated but to be useful as a programming language))) My idea is simple: if it is useful then people will use it.)))
Sep 09 2016
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Kai Nacke via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce puremagic.com> wrote:On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 at 10:51:16 UTC, eugene wrote:Its not childish at all, if you could show a chart of visits and downloads vs news announcements its likely there is a correlation. However I think these days most of us that are researching alternatives only do so when necessary, so there is a chance that your work now will only pay off later when someone finds D and wants to check its pedigree.On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 at 09:42:11 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote:News ticker often refer to the LLVM release notes. E.g. the Heise news ticker (http://www.heise.de/) always reports about a new LLVM release. But I never succeded to place a new LDC release into the ticker. It's simply a good way to more people and get some advertising. With every new LDC release I inform LLVM Weekly (http://llvmweekly.org/), too, which is a widely read news letter. From one of these source, news about LDC spread to other sites like phoronix (http://phoronix.com/). Maybe counting of each reference is a bit childish (but fun). The real question is:There are lot of projects using LLVM [1]. The fact that LDC if often cited in the release notes means that it's one of the best. This is free advertisement, as the LLVM release notes are read by PL people that may not know D. The fact that LDC is recognized as one of the most important LLVM projects also means that the LLVM folks will try to help the LDC folks when needed. [1] http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/i dont think counting each time when ldc and d are mentioned in llvm community will help ldc and d to become popular)))What do YOU do to advocate D? Regards, Kai
Sep 09 2016