digitalmars.D.announce - MiniD 2 Plans
- Jarrett Billingsley (39/39) Oct 21 2008 MiniD 2 has been under development for over a year now, and I think it's...
- BLS (4/7) Oct 21 2008 Thanks Jarret.
- Jacob Carlborg (3/55) Oct 22 2008 Very nice. There is now support for Mach-O (the format used on osx) in
MiniD 2 has been under development for over a year now, and I think it's finally almost ready! It ended up taking a lot longer than I expected, mostly because I got the wild idea to reimplement the whole thing back in May. Until now, it has been in alpha, but I think I'm ready to call it _beta_. Wooo. Currently there are a few reasons why I'm calling it beta. They are: - The binding library is not complete. It wraps free functions, and that's about it. - There are a few code generation bugs in the compiler (well not "bugs" but "fairly big changes") that need to happen. - There are some additions to the standard library that I feel are important. - The new implementation has not been tested to any appreciable degree. - I'd really, really like to get shared libraries in for the release. I think DDL is mature enough, I just have to sit down with it. One issue though is Linux, since DDL doesn't yet (?) load ELF, so I don't know if it's actually possible right now. - I want to decide whether the 'int' type should be platform-dependent or always 64-bit. Once those things are sorted out, I think it'll be ready to go gold. When will this be? I hate making promises about this sort of thing because things always seem to come up and eat my time. The first month and a half of school was absolute hell; the calm now only makes me dread how busy it'll probably be again in November. But if I stick to it I think I can get MiniD 2 to release quality in few weeks or so. I know, development doesn't move nearly as quickly as when I'm out of school. Once 2.0 is released, though, I plan on making many more maintenance releases to MD2 than I did with MD1. Standard library additions, non-breaking language additions, bugfixes (obviously), native API additions etc. The binding library in particular may be very basic upon release and would be improved afterwards. What does this mean for 1.0? I think it's time to put the thing to rest. It's outdated and the implementation is subpar. MiniD 2 is superior to it in almost every way. As of now, MiniD 1 is no longer being supported. It will be moved into a branch of the SVN repository and MiniD 2 will become trunk. I think that's everything that needs to be said for now. And as always, the main page is at http://www.dsource.org/projects/minid, and the forums are at http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=94.
Oct 21 2008
BLS <nanali nospam-wanadoo.fr> Jarrett Billingsley schrieb:I think that's everything that needs to be said for now. And as always, the main page is at http://www.dsource.org/projects/minid, and the forums are at http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=94.Thanks Jarret. I think the effort you made to document MiniD so detailed requires and is worth another: Thanks man
Oct 21 2008
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:MiniD 2 has been under development for over a year now, and I think it's finally almost ready! It ended up taking a lot longer than I expected, mostly because I got the wild idea to reimplement the whole thing back in May. Until now, it has been in alpha, but I think I'm ready to call it _beta_. Wooo. Currently there are a few reasons why I'm calling it beta. They are: - The binding library is not complete. It wraps free functions, and that's about it. - There are a few code generation bugs in the compiler (well not "bugs" but "fairly big changes") that need to happen. - There are some additions to the standard library that I feel are important. - The new implementation has not been tested to any appreciable degree. - I'd really, really like to get shared libraries in for the release. I think DDL is mature enough, I just have to sit down with it. One issue though is Linux, since DDL doesn't yet (?) load ELF, so I don't know if it's actually possible right now. - I want to decide whether the 'int' type should be platform-dependent or always 64-bit. Once those things are sorted out, I think it'll be ready to go gold. When will this be? I hate making promises about this sort of thing because things always seem to come up and eat my time. The first month and a half of school was absolute hell; the calm now only makes me dread how busy it'll probably be again in November. But if I stick to it I think I can get MiniD 2 to release quality in few weeks or so. I know, development doesn't move nearly as quickly as when I'm out of school. Once 2.0 is released, though, I plan on making many more maintenance releases to MD2 than I did with MD1. Standard library additions, non-breaking language additions, bugfixes (obviously), native API additions etc. The binding library in particular may be very basic upon release and would be improved afterwards. What does this mean for 1.0? I think it's time to put the thing to rest. It's outdated and the implementation is subpar. MiniD 2 is superior to it in almost every way. As of now, MiniD 1 is no longer being supported. It will be moved into a branch of the SVN repository and MiniD 2 will become trunk. I think that's everything that needs to be said for now. And as always, the main page is at http://www.dsource.org/projects/minid, and the forums are at http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=94.Very nice. There is now support for Mach-O (the format used on osx) in DDL either.
Oct 22 2008