www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.announce - Invitation to review new DIP PR

reply Mike Parker <aldacron gmail.com> writes:
There's a PR for a new DIP titled "Delegatable Functions" [1]. If 
you have time, I invite you to review the PR to make sure it's in 
the best state possible for moving forward to a merge and 
preliminary review. At this stage, we're looking for copy edits 
(grammar, spelling, vocabulary), line edits (rephrasing 
sentences, restructuring paragraphs) and content (are there any 
major holes in the proposal, unanswered questions).

Thanks in advance to any and all who participate.

[1] https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/61
May 14
next sibling parent Dominikus Dittes Scherkl <Dominikus.Scherkl continental-corporation.com> writes:
On Monday, 15 May 2017 at 06:03:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
 There's a PR for a new DIP titled "Delegatable Functions" [1]. 
 If you have time, I invite you to review the PR to make sure 
 it's in the best state possible for moving forward to a merge 
 and preliminary review. At this stage, we're looking for copy 
 edits (grammar, spelling, vocabulary), line edits (rephrasing 
 sentences, restructuring paragraphs) and content (are there any 
 major holes in the proposal, unanswered questions).

 Thanks in advance to any and all who participate.

 [1] https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/61
Looks good to me.
May 15
prev sibling parent reply Eugene Wissner <belka caraus.de> writes:
On Monday, 15 May 2017 at 06:03:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
 There's a PR for a new DIP titled "Delegatable Functions" [1]. 
 If you have time, I invite you to review the PR to make sure 
 it's in the best state possible for moving forward to a merge 
 and preliminary review. At this stage, we're looking for copy 
 edits (grammar, spelling, vocabulary), line edits (rephrasing 
 sentences, restructuring paragraphs) and content (are there any 
 major holes in the proposal, unanswered questions).

 Thanks in advance to any and all who participate.

 [1] https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/61
Abstract: "It is therefore proposed to add sematics to define functions" "n" is missing in "semantics".
May 15
parent Mike Parker <aldacron gmail.com> writes:
On Monday, 15 May 2017 at 10:43:13 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
 Thanks in advance to any and all who participate.

 [1] https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/61
Abstract: "It is therefore proposed to add sematics to define functions" "n" is missing in "semantics".
Thanks, but please keep all such feedback in the PR thread.
May 15