• Mike Parker (6/6) Sep 28 2016 Steven Schveighoffer has contributed an article to the blog
• jmh530 (4/10) Sep 28 2016 There is a typo in
• Mike Parker (4/16) Sep 28 2016 Are you referring to ssize_t? If so, that's not a typo. It's the
• jmh530 (4/7) Sep 28 2016 I thought you meant size_t, but glad to know that I wasn't

Mike Parker <aldacron gmail.com> writes:

Steven Schveighoffer has contributed an article to the blog 
explaining  trusted and advising on its proper usage.

Post: 
https://dlang.org/blog/2016/09/28/how-to-write-trusted-code-in-d/

Reddit: 
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/54wg8r/memory_safety_how_to_write_trusted_code_in_d/

jmh530 <john.michael.hall gmail.com> writes:

On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 14:02:45 UTC, Mike Parker 
wrote:
 Steven Schveighoffer has contributed an article to the blog 
 explaining  trusted and advising on its proper usage.

 Post: 
 https://dlang.org/blog/2016/09/28/how-to-write-trusted-code-in-d/

 Reddit: 
 https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/54wg8r/memory_safety_how_to_write_trusted_code_in_d/

There is a typo in
ssize_t read(int fd, void *ptr, size_t nBytes);

Mike Parker <aldacron gmail.com> writes:

On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 14:34:20 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
 On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 14:02:45 UTC, Mike Parker 
 wrote:
 Steven Schveighoffer has contributed an article to the blog 
 explaining  trusted and advising on its proper usage.

 Post: 
 https://dlang.org/blog/2016/09/28/how-to-write-trusted-code-in-d/

 Reddit: 
 https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/54wg8r/memory_safety_how_to_write_trusted_code_in_d/

 There is a typo in
 ssize_t read(int fd, void *ptr, size_t nBytes);

Are you referring to ssize_t? If so, that's not a typo. It's the 
signed version of size_t. The * should be next to the void, 
though.

jmh530 <john.michael.hall gmail.com> writes:

On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 14:44:17 UTC, Mike Parker 
wrote:
 Are you referring to ssize_t? If so, that's not a typo. It's 
 the signed version of size_t. The * should be next to the void, 
 though.

I thought you meant size_t, but glad to know that I wasn't 
totally wrong.