www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.announce - DMD 0.127

reply "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:
Bugs fixed.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
Jun 16 2005
parent reply Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> writes:
Walter wrote:
 Bugs fixed.
 
 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

"Fixed D.bugs/4249" In what respect was this a bug? Stewart. -- My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox. Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.
Jun 17 2005
next sibling parent Sean Kelly <sean f4.ca> writes:
In article <d8u3rb$t88$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Stewart Gordon says...
Walter wrote:
 Bugs fixed.
 
 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

"Fixed D.bugs/4249" In what respect was this a bug?

Perhaps recursive inheritance should not be allowed? I'm kind of confused by this one too. Sean
Jun 17 2005
prev sibling parent reply "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:
"Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d8u3rb$t88$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Walter wrote:
 Bugs fixed.

 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

"Fixed D.bugs/4249" In what respect was this a bug?

I didn't think it was right or intuitive that A, A.A, A.A.A, A.A.A.A, etc., were all the same thing.
Jun 17 2005
parent reply Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.this-is-spam.cn> writes:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Walter schrieb am Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:42:22 -0700:
 "Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> wrote in message
 news:d8u3rb$t88$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Walter wrote:
 Bugs fixed.

 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

"Fixed D.bugs/4249" In what respect was this a bug?

I didn't think it was right or intuitive that A, A.A, A.A.A, A.A.A.A, etc., were all the same thing.

Is this documented? Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFCs8fa3w+/yD4P9tIRAnO+AJ92C15FNeQSk3fER9HGqt3rOkgZcACdF+Bq HuxgC3fsGDBB3eAymIs7R/g= =QBOr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Jun 18 2005
parent reply "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:
"Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop kuehne.this-is-spam.cn> wrote in message
news:qntco2-4k4.ln1 lnews.kuehne.cn...
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 Hash: SHA1

 Walter schrieb am Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:42:22 -0700:
 "Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> wrote in message
 news:d8u3rb$t88$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Walter wrote:
 Bugs fixed.

 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

"Fixed D.bugs/4249" In what respect was this a bug?

I didn't think it was right or intuitive that A, A.A, A.A.A, A.A.A.A,


 were all the same thing.

Is this documented?

Not sure, but I think it's implicit that A is not a part of A, and furthermore, it servers no purpose to support A.A, A.A.A, etc.
Jun 18 2005
parent James Dunne <james.jdunne gmail.com> writes:
"Operator Overloading" documentation still has === referred to ;) (just past
opCmp stuff)

In article <d91k96$oh9$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
"Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop kuehne.this-is-spam.cn> wrote in message
news:qntco2-4k4.ln1 lnews.kuehne.cn...
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 Hash: SHA1

 Walter schrieb am Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:42:22 -0700:
 "Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> wrote in message
 news:d8u3rb$t88$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Walter wrote:
 Bugs fixed.

 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

"Fixed D.bugs/4249" In what respect was this a bug?

I didn't think it was right or intuitive that A, A.A, A.A.A, A.A.A.A,


 were all the same thing.

Is this documented?

Not sure, but I think it's implicit that A is not a part of A, and furthermore, it servers no purpose to support A.A, A.A.A, etc.

Regards, James Dunne
Jun 29 2005