www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.announce - Re2d

reply "Joey Peters" <squirrel nidhogg.com> writes:
I made a small adjustment to http://re2c.org/ re2c, a lexical analyser 
generator to not produce #line tags. The rest it generates is still 
compatible with D.
Apr 07 2005
parent reply Carlos <carlos2003nov yahoo.ca> writes:
Joey Peters wrote:

 I made a small adjustment to http://re2c.org/ re2c, a lexical analyser 
 generator to not produce #line tags. The rest it generates is still 
 compatible with D. 
 
 



the March 12, 2005 package ?

Very recently some bugs have been corrected
in the CVS.

Did you removed line tags production, because you dont need
them, or because they are imcompatible with D ?

I think #line tags are compatible with D.
those are called special tokens.

C
Apr 07 2005
parent reply "Joey Peters" <squirrel nidhogg.com> writes:
The package one, not the CVS one, I don't have a CVS client, yet.

No, I don't think #line s work. The whole #x functionality has been taken 
out and been elegantly put into new features, but I don't know about #line's 
replacement.

"Carlos" <carlos2003nov yahoo.ca> schreef in bericht 
news:d34vv7$1c9d$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 Joey Peters wrote:

 I made a small adjustment to http://re2c.org/ re2c, a lexical analyser 
 generator to not produce #line tags. The rest it generates is still 
 compatible with D.



 the March 12, 2005 package ?

 Very recently some bugs have been corrected
 in the CVS.

 Did you removed line tags production, because you dont need
 them, or because they are imcompatible with D ?

 I think #line tags are compatible with D.
 those are called special tokens.

 C
Apr 08 2005
parent reply Carlos <carlos2003nov yahoo.ca> writes:
Joey Peters wrote:


 No, I don't think #line s work. The whole #x functionality has been taken 
 out and been elegantly put into new features, but I don't know about #line's 
 replacement.



http://www.digitalmars.com/d/lex.html#specialtokenseq
Apr 08 2005
parent "Joey Peters" <squirrel nidhogg.com> writes:
Ok that's -really- weird, why did they choose to keep -that-? They could 
replace it with a pragma or something else more elegant. Hmmm... I stand 
corrected.

"Carlos" <carlos2003nov yahoo.ca> schreef in bericht 
news:d35put$2abk$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 Joey Peters wrote:


 No, I don't think #line s work. The whole #x functionality has been taken 
 out and been elegantly put into new features, but I don't know about 
 #line's replacement.



 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/lex.html#specialtokenseq
Apr 08 2005