digitalmars.D - User Defined Annotations
- Andrew Wiley <debio264 gmail.com> Mar 10 2011
- bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> Mar 10 2011
- Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> Mar 10 2011
- Andrew Wiley <debio264 gmail.com> Mar 11 2011
This is a topic that seems to come up every so often (well, I bring it up every so often, but I haven't really heard negative remarks about it), and I was wondering what it would take to move forward with getting user defined annotations into the language, and whether it would be feasible for D2. Would the next step be to make a full proposal?
Mar 10 2011
Andrew Wiley:Would the next step be to make a full proposal?
Creating a pre-D Enhancement Proposal (pre-DEP) is good. Bye, bearophile
Mar 10 2011
On 2011-03-11 04:30, Andrew Wiley wrote:This is a topic that seems to come up every so often (well, I bring it up every so often, but I haven't really heard negative remarks about it), and I was wondering what it would take to move forward with getting user defined annotations into the language, and whether it would be feasible for D2. Would the next step be to make a full proposal?
For this to be useful that language would probably need better reflection capabilities, either compile time or runtime. -- /Jacob Carlborg
Mar 10 2011
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> wrote:On 2011-03-11 04:30, Andrew Wiley wrote:This is a topic that seems to come up every so often (well, I bring it up every so often, but I haven't really heard negative remarks about it), and I was wondering what it would take to move forward with getting user defined annotations into the language, and whether it would be feasible for D2. Would the next step be to make a full proposal?
For this to be useful that language would probably need better reflection capabilities, either compile time or runtime.
As I see it, the proposal should probably include how this should look in compile time reflection. As far as I know, runtime reflection has even less of a plan than user defined annotations, and the two should probably be proposed separately.
Mar 11 2011









bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> 