digitalmars.D - Unofficial wish list status.
- 4tuu4k002 sneakemail.com (110/110) Mar 31 2007 Hi
-
Brad Roberts
(4/10)
Mar 31 2007
- Derek Parnell (7/19) Apr 01 2007 Yeah, its quite useless information nowadays.
- Knud Soerensen (5/17) Apr 01 2007 Well, it a quite a bit of work to go trough
Hi This is the monthly status for the unofficial d wish list: http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/ Right now the wish list looks like this: 132 array initialization/literals 112 Reflection API 98 Stack tracing 89 Faster GC 88 vectorization 62 Short syntax for new 62 Multiple opCast per class 61 Multiple return values (tuples 59 Improved Foreach 56 readonly/const enforcement 55 unit test after compilation 53 extra compiler values 51 Native AMD64 codegen 46 !in 45 Debug check for null reference 44 Explicit out/inout 44 Stack allocated classes. 39 Unit test isolation 37 Return-type overloading 36 Posix threads support native 35 Array masking 34 Auto new-ing of classes 34 Foreach on first/on last 32 Explicit type initializers 31 better syntax for cast 29 Weak references/pointers 28 black box unit testing 28 Consistent struct/class sizeof 27 associative arrays by index 27 Pass value params byref 26 unit test & code separation 25 coherent assoc. array syntax 25 Templates in classes 25 auto-member objects 22 Renaming ctor/dtor 22 Array pushback/popback 21 Explicit module `friendship` 21 Header File generation by DMD 20 Unit test measurements 20 Non-Static isExpression 20 Experimental d compiler 19 proper cast operators 19 User-defined sync function 15 Conditional syncronized 15 Eigenpoll fix 15 L-Value return 14 opIn 14 Iterators and Generators 13 OS X Build 12 Built-in variant type 12 Named keyword arguments 11 D library contest 11 Pascal like sets 10 imag and comp FP types. 10 struct literal/initialization 10 Small Exectables 9 Add native string type 9 inout variable and return 9 Precise names for floats 9 Explicit property keyword 8 Call log 8 Pascal casing for methods, mod 8 modules must not rely on files 8 struct constructor 7 Against class instance sizeof 7 conv() and opConv 7 Meta Information 7 Variadic arguments re-passing 6 Improve module architecture 6 Finite sets 6 function inheritance 5 Relational class/array algebra 5 inline expansion 5 interface to C++ 5 Inline enum declaration 5 No Postfix Array Declarations 5 if, while, true, false, int 4 Declaration in function calls 4 This list makes a difference? 4 Variadic template arguments 4 In flight exception detection 3 opCast overloading 3 System.Windows.Forms 3 copy operator 3 support struct&array in switch 2 Manage .resources files 2 Multistep return 2 garbage collection switch 2 named tuple 2 range type 2 Multi-Dimensional Allocation 2 Explicit out/inout/lazy 1 consistant new 1 Parallel Scavenging GC 1 array in template arguments 1 Statically check for == null 1 constant operater overloading 1 deduce function return type 1 date/time/datetime literal 1 solve interdepend static this 1 function call over network 1 temp alias param specialize 1 Better UTF32 Support 0 allow change self interface(?) 0 Explicit 'property' keyword 0 Reallocation Keyword
Mar 31 2007
4tuu4k002 sneakemail.com wrote:Hi This is the monthly status for the unofficial d wish list: http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/ Right now the wish list looks like this:<snip> What's the point of continuing to post this list periodically without actually updating it in any meaningful way?
Mar 31 2007
Derek Parnell <derek psych.ward> On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 18:29:50 -0700, Brad Roberts wrote:4tuu4k002 sneakemail.com wrote:Yeah, its quite useless information nowadays. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia "Justice for David Hicks!" skype: derek.j.parnellHi This is the monthly status for the unofficial d wish list: http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/ Right now the wish list looks like this:<snip> What's the point of continuing to post this list periodically without actually updating it in any meaningful way?
Apr 01 2007
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 18:29:50 -0700, Brad Roberts wrote:4tuu4k002 sneakemail.com wrote:Well, it a quite a bit of work to go trough all the wishes and decide if they still is meaningful. So, I will make it possible to report a item for cleanup and hope that will help make the list more meaningful.Hi This is the monthly status for the unofficial d wish list: http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/ Right now the wish list looks like this:<snip> What's the point of continuing to post this list periodically without actually updating it in any meaningful way?
Apr 01 2007