• "Nick Sabalausky" <a a.a> Jul 03 2008
• Gregor Richards <Richards codu.org> Jul 03 2008
• "Nick Sabalausky" <a a.a> Jul 03 2008
• superdan <super dan.org> Jul 03 2008

"Nick Sabalausky" <a a.a> writes:

Pretty much just as the subject says. It's rare and far from major, but I've 
come across a few places where it would be nice to be able to say "if(A ^^ 
B)" instead of "if(A && !B || !A && B)". 

Gregor Richards <Richards codu.org> writes:

Nick Sabalausky wrote:
 Pretty much just as the subject says. It's rare and far from major, but I've 
 come across a few places where it would be nice to be able to say "if(A ^^ 
 B)" instead of "if(A && !B || !A && B)". 
 
 


!= is xor, genius.

  - Gregor Richards

"Nick Sabalausky" <a a.a> writes:

"Gregor Richards" <Richards codu.org> wrote in message 
news:486DA24F.3090706 codu.org...
 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
 Pretty much just as the subject says. It's rare and far from major, but 
 I've come across a few places where it would be nice to be able to say 
 "if(A ^^ B)" instead of "if(A && !B || !A && B)".


 != is xor, genius.

  - Gregor Richards


Heh, oh yea :)

if((x == 1) != (y != 2))

No reason for that not to work.

Too tired today :) 

superdan <super dan.org> writes:

Gregor Richards Wrote:

 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
 Pretty much just as the subject says. It's rare and far from major, but I've 
 come across a few places where it would be nice to be able to say "if(A ^^ 
 B)" instead of "if(A && !B || !A && B)". 
 
 


 != is xor, genius.


and <= is implication btw. but it does exhaustive evaluation unfortunately.