• Brian Schott (4/4) Aug 16 2013 I took a break from doing useful things, and made this:
• monarch_dodra (3/7) Aug 17 2013 Cool. What is the input data? Phobos?
• =?UTF-8?B?U8O2bmtlIEx1ZHdpZw==?= (5/9) Aug 17 2013 Cool idea! But even considering that std.datetime is a monster module,
• Jonathan M Davis (18/30) Aug 17 2013 ut
• Brian Schott (6/18) Aug 17 2013 I ran through my code again, increasing the number of words that

"Brian Schott" <briancschott gmail.com> writes:

I took a break from doing useful things, and made this:

http://imgur.com/Bro0DYT

Infer what you will from the frequencies of certain keywords and 
identifiers.

"monarch_dodra" <monarchdodra gmail.com> writes:

On Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 05:57:08 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
 I took a break from doing useful things, and made this:

 http://imgur.com/Bro0DYT

 Infer what you will from the frequencies of certain keywords 
 and identifiers.

Cool. What is the input data? Phobos?

I find it *awesome* that assert is one of the most used keywords.

=?UTF-8?B?U8O2bmtlIEx1ZHdpZw==?= <sludwig outerproduct.org> writes:

Am 17.08.2013 07:57, schrieb Brian Schott:
 I took a break from doing useful things, and made this:

 http://imgur.com/Bro0DYT

 Infer what you will from the frequencies of certain keywords and
 identifiers.

Cool idea! But even considering that std.datetime is a monster module, 
can it really be true that "Date" is as frequent as "assert" throughout 
the code base? It somehow looks like _only_ std.datetime made it into 
the final statistic.

Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> writes:

On Saturday, August 17, 2013 09:25:41 S=C3=B6nke Ludwig wrote:
 Am 17.08.2013 07:57, schrieb Brian Schott:
 I took a break from doing useful things, and made this:
=20
 http://imgur.com/Bro0DYT
=20
 Infer what you will from the frequencies of certain keywords and
 identifiers.

=20
 Cool idea! But even considering that std.datetime is a monster module=

,
 can it really be true that "Date" is as frequent as "assert" througho=

ut
 the code base? It somehow looks like _only_ std.datetime made it into=

 the final statistic.

It's due to how many unit tests std.datetime has. There are a _lot_ of=20=

assertions in there. I reworked some of them to loop more rather than j=
ust be=20
a straight set of tests, but I still have a long way to go, so assert a=
nd=20
assertPred are used a _lot_ in that module (and even after that refacto=
ring is=20
done, there will still be plenty of assertions - just not quite so many=
). If=20
the unit tests weren't counted, std.datetime would probably be a much, =
much=20
smaller portion of the count (something like 3/4 of that module is unit=
=20
tests).

- Jonathan M Davis

"Brian Schott" <briancschott gmail.com> writes:

On Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 07:25:53 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
 Am 17.08.2013 07:57, schrieb Brian Schott:
 I took a break from doing useful things, and made this:

 http://imgur.com/Bro0DYT

 Infer what you will from the frequencies of certain keywords 
 and
 identifiers.

 Cool idea! But even considering that std.datetime is a monster 
 module, can it really be true that "Date" is as frequent as 
 "assert" throughout the code base? It somehow looks like _only_ 
 std.datetime made it into the final statistic.

I ran through my code again, increasing the number of words that 
made it to the final list by quite a bit. (For a minute or two I 
thought you were right and that I had a bug)

This is actually all of Phobos. "EmailStatusCode" and 
CodePointSet" aren't in datetime.