• Robert Fraser <fraserofthenight gmail.com> Sep 23 2007
• "Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> Sep 23 2007
• Robert Fraser <fraserofthenight gmail.com> Sep 23 2007
• "Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> Sep 23 2007

Robert Fraser <fraserofthenight gmail.com> writes:

redsea Wrote:

 code coverage report can not support mixin template :(


I'll need to see how the code coverage ABI works, but it might be more than
possible that code coverage for those lines are tracked but there's no way to
display it. If that's the case, some IDE might someday be able to expand the
templates inline and ho coverage, or alternatively aggregate this data and show
coverage for an entire template (and maybe use pretty colored lines to do so if
you ask nice). "someday" being the keyword.

"Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> writes:

"Robert Fraser" <fraserofthenight gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:fd6odt$14qt$1 digitalmars.com...
 redsea Wrote:

 code coverage report can not support mixin template :(


 I'll need to see how the code coverage ABI works, but it might be more 
 than possible that code coverage for those lines are tracked but there's 
 no way to display it. If that's the case, some IDE might someday be able 
 to expand the templates inline and ho coverage, or alternatively aggregate 
 this data and show coverage for an entire template (and maybe use pretty 
 colored lines to do so if you ask nice). "someday" being the keyword.


It keeps what amounts to a large static array of ints (longs?), and inserts 
an "inc [address of counter that corresponds to this line]" instruction 
after each line of functional code.  To that end, it'd have to keep track of 
every instantiation of a template, be it mixed in or whatever, and count all 
those instantiations' lines separately.  It'd probably also have to indicate 
which instantiation of the template each line count was for. 

Robert Fraser <fraserofthenight gmail.com> writes:

Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:

 "Robert Fraser" <fraserofthenight gmail.com> wrote in message 
 news:fd6odt$14qt$1 digitalmars.com...
 redsea Wrote:

 code coverage report can not support mixin template :(


 I'll need to see how the code coverage ABI works, but it might be more 
 than possible that code coverage for those lines are tracked but there's 
 no way to display it. If that's the case, some IDE might someday be able 
 to expand the templates inline and ho coverage, or alternatively aggregate 
 this data and show coverage for an entire template (and maybe use pretty 
 colored lines to do so if you ask nice). "someday" being the keyword.


 It keeps what amounts to a large static array of ints (longs?), and inserts 
 an "inc [address of counter that corresponds to this line]" instruction 
 after each line of functional code.  To that end, it'd have to keep track of 
 every instantiation of a template, be it mixed in or whatever, and count all 
 those instantiations' lines separately.  It'd probably also have to indicate 
 which instantiation of the template each line count was for. 
 
 


I _was_ assuming it already did these things, but now I'm assuming not...

"Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> writes:

"Robert Fraser" <fraserofthenight gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:fd6osr$15j1$1 digitalmars.com...
 I _was_ assuming it already did these things, but now I'm assuming not...


Don't know about all possible cases, but a simple test using a templated 
function shows that it collapses the counts for all instantiations of the 
template into one.  So if you call three separate specializations of the 
templated function, it'll show (in the listing) the templated function 
having been called three times, instead of splitting up the specializations.