• bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> Feb 04 2010

bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> writes:

Chad J:
 This reminds me of a discussion we had a year or more ago about offering
 abstract operators purely for the purpose of overloading.  We can use
 things like (+), (*), (-), (&), and so on.  It'd probably be fine to use
 one for dot product.


This looks acceptable as dot product:
x (*) y
but to me it doesn't look that much better than the simple:
x.dot(y)

Bye,
bearophile