digitalmars.D - Properties and macros on WalterAndrei.pdf.
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Julio_C=E9sar_Carrascal_Urquijo?= (20/20) Sep 05 2007 Regarding slides 9 through 11 of WalterAndrei.pdf (Uniform Function Call...
- Robert Fraser (2/29) Sep 05 2007 I'm guessing probably not, as the current array-member-function syntax r...
- Jason House (3/30) Sep 05 2007 I'm too tired/lazy to look it up, but I could swear that there was a
Regarding slides 9 through 11 of WalterAndrei.pdf (Uniform Function Call Syntax) would we be allowed to add properties to a class? For example: void foo(Matrix m, char[] value) { // ... } char[] foo(Matrix m) { // ... } m.foo = "parrot"; writefln("It's a dead %s.", m.foo); //-> It's a dead parrot. Now on pages 45 - 51 on AST Macros... Would it be possible to declare a macro as a static member of a class or struct? Example: struct Matrix { macro foo(e) { e = 3; } } Matrix.foo(q); // I didn't pick the names. Don't blame me for it. ;) Thanks
Sep 05 2007
Julio César Carrascal Urquijo Wrote:Regarding slides 9 through 11 of WalterAndrei.pdf (Uniform Function Call Syntax) would we be allowed to add properties to a class? For example: void foo(Matrix m, char[] value) { // ... } char[] foo(Matrix m) { // ... } m.foo = "parrot"; writefln("It's a dead %s.", m.foo); //-> It's a dead parrot. Now on pages 45 - 51 on AST Macros... Would it be possible to declare a macro as a static member of a class or struct? Example: struct Matrix { macro foo(e) { e = 3; } } Matrix.foo(q); // I didn't pick the names. Don't blame me for it. ;) ThanksI'm guessing probably not, as the current array-member-function syntax requires parens. I don't think it would make lookup _much_ harder, though.
Sep 05 2007
Julio César Carrascal Urquijo wrote:Regarding slides 9 through 11 of WalterAndrei.pdf (Uniform Function Call Syntax) would we be allowed to add properties to a class? For example: void foo(Matrix m, char[] value) { // ... } char[] foo(Matrix m) { // ... } m.foo = "parrot"; writefln("It's a dead %s.", m.foo); //-> It's a dead parrot. Now on pages 45 - 51 on AST Macros... Would it be possible to declare a macro as a static member of a class or struct? Example: struct Matrix { macro foo(e) { e = 3; } } Matrix.foo(q); // I didn't pick the names. Don't blame me for it. ;) ThanksI'm too tired/lazy to look it up, but I could swear that there was a line in there saying that this functionality would not extend to macros.
Sep 05 2007