www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - Primary D Website Dilapidated?

reply "AJ" <aj nospam.net> writes:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 Oh, and BTW, invariant is deprecated, use immutable instead.

Nov 06 2009
next sibling parent reply Jesse Phillips <jessekphillips gmail.com> writes:
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:57:24 -0600, AJ wrote:

 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 Oh, and BTW, invariant is deprecated, use immutable instead.


I assume you are referring to the use of 'invariant' in the documentation? If so, you should report it as a bug. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/
Nov 07 2009
parent "AJ" <aj nospam.net> writes:
Jesse Phillips wrote:
 On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:57:24 -0600, AJ wrote:

 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 Oh, and BTW, invariant is deprecated, use immutable instead.


I assume you are referring to the use of 'invariant' in the documentation? If so, you should report it as a bug. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/

pfft
Nov 08 2009
prev sibling parent "Steven Schveighoffer" <schveiguy yahoo.com> writes:
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:57:24 -0500, AJ <aj nospam.net> wrote:

 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 Oh, and BTW, invariant is deprecated, use immutable instead.


Do you mean the docs say invariant instead of immutable? At least for the spec, it's mostly updated to use immutable instead of invariant. Also note that invariant still means something when you are talking about class/struct invariants. One axiom to open source software -- docs always are last in line for attention ;) As the other poster says, file a bug if you notice a problem. -Steve
Nov 09 2009