digitalmars.D - Not just for cryptography
- bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> Jul 27 2008
- Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> Jul 28 2008
- Bruno Medeiros <brunodomedeiros+spam com.gmail> Aug 11 2008
Another little story for people that think the multi-precision integers are mostly good for cryptography: http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=614&Itemid= Bye, bearophile
Jul 27 2008
bearophile wrote:Another little story for people that think the multi-precision integers are mostly good for cryptography: http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=614&Itemid=
Avoiding computation overflow is never a bad thing :) Sean
Jul 28 2008
bearophile wrote:Another little story for people that think the multi-precision integers are mostly good for cryptography: http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=614&Itemid= Bye, bearophile
That's what happens when people use "undefined" behavior as an ambiguous expression that can mean both "illegal" behavior, and "unspecified in some aspects but valid" behavior. Illegal behavior should be called illegal behavior, period. (http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/2008-April/036814.html) -- Bruno Medeiros - Software Developer, MSc. in CS/E graduate http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D
Aug 11 2008









Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> 