digitalmars.D - Minimalistic Phobos?
- Fredrik Olsson <peylow gmail.com> Oct 27 2006
- Chris Nicholson-Sauls <ibisbasenji gmail.com> Oct 27 2006
- Sean Kelly <sean f4.ca> Oct 27 2006
- Sean Kelly <sean f4.ca> Oct 27 2006
I am looking into using D for an embedded system, for this GDC for ARM, and some tweaking of Phobos needed. For this I find most of the functionality in Phobos is kind of superfluous. So my question is, what are the bare minimum needed to get D up and running? And would it not be a good idea to move this from std.* to say core.* or equivalent? // Fredrik Olsson
Oct 27 2006
Fredrik Olsson wrote:I am looking into using D for an embedded system, for this GDC for ARM, and some tweaking of Phobos needed. For this I find most of the functionality in Phobos is kind of superfluous. So my question is, what are the bare minimum needed to get D up and running? And would it not be a good idea to move this from std.* to say core.* or equivalent? // Fredrik Olsson
You could take a look at Ares to get a good idea. The only ones I know for sure are module 'object' and package 'std.internal'. Giving the required runtime code its own 'core' package (or whatever name) isn't a bad idea. -- Chris Nicholson-Sauls
Oct 27 2006
Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:Fredrik Olsson wrote:I am looking into using D for an embedded system, for this GDC for ARM, and some tweaking of Phobos needed. For this I find most of the functionality in Phobos is kind of superfluous. So my question is, what are the bare minimum needed to get D up and running? And would it not be a good idea to move this from std.* to say core.* or equivalent? // Fredrik Olsson
You could take a look at Ares to get a good idea. The only ones I know for sure are module 'object' and package 'std.internal'. Giving the required runtime code its own 'core' package (or whatever name) isn't a bad idea.
A few other modules needed offhand: std.thread std.asserterror std.cover (for -cov, not used by gdc) std.moduleinit std.outofmemory std.switcherror std.syserror std/typeinfo/* Aside from import dependencies by the code in internal, I think that about covers it. And you can stub out the thread code if you aren't targeting a multithreaded system. Sean
Oct 27 2006
Sean Kelly wrote:Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:Fredrik Olsson wrote:I am looking into using D for an embedded system, for this GDC for ARM, and some tweaking of Phobos needed. For this I find most of the functionality in Phobos is kind of superfluous. So my question is, what are the bare minimum needed to get D up and running? And would it not be a good idea to move this from std.* to say core.* or equivalent? // Fredrik Olsson
You could take a look at Ares to get a good idea. The only ones I know for sure are module 'object' and package 'std.internal'. Giving the required runtime code its own 'core' package (or whatever name) isn't a bad idea.
A few other modules needed offhand: std.thread std.asserterror std.cover (for -cov, not used by gdc) std.moduleinit std.outofmemory std.switcherror std.syserror
Oops, I think syserror is for converting system errors to strings and is not an error handler itself. This one shouldn't be necessary after all. Sean
Oct 27 2006








Sean Kelly <sean f4.ca>