digitalmars.D - Logotype
- DavidSwe <afraidof spam.bot> Feb 27 2007
- Manfred Nowak <svv1999 hotmail.com> Feb 27 2007
- DavidSwe <afraidof spam.bot> Feb 28 2007
- Jascha Wetzel <"[firstname]" mainia.de> Feb 28 2007
- Charlie <charlie.fats gmail.com> Feb 27 2007
- janderson <askme me.com> Feb 27 2007
- janderson <askme me.com> Feb 27 2007
- Wolfgang Draxinger <wdraxinger darkstargames.de> Feb 28 2007
It would be nice if Bright could select an official logotype that could be used for promoting purposes. I found alot of nice logos at: http://www.sukimashita.com/d/ http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?Logo
Feb 27 2007
DavidSwe wroteBright could select an official logotype
Walter has made that selection long ago: by kindly asking what might be wrong with his D-Man. -manfred
Feb 27 2007
Im just saying that I think D deserves a more professional looking logo. The D-Man and the new logo can peacefully coexist. So those who have a "soft-spot for the D-Man" can use it and those who dont like it can use something else. It would be nice if Bright decided one for us that want to support D but don't want a hand drawn character on their homepage. Having to many logos will also be a bother because that will just start confusion, especially since there have been other languages that have called themselves D if my memory serves. Manfred Nowak Wrote:DavidSwe wroteBright could select an official logotype
Walter has made that selection long ago: by kindly asking what might be wrong with his D-Man. -manfred
Feb 28 2007
if there is really a need for another logo, i'd suggest holding a logo-design-competition, like linus torvalds did once to find tux. and btw - tux probably doesn't satisfy the attribute "professional looking" either, at least if it's in that "corporate style, will be taken seriously by suit-wearing folks"-meaning. personally, i added a logo to the ddbg page only to get rid of all those 404's on favicon.ico ;) DavidSwe wrote:Im just saying that I think D deserves a more professional looking logo. The D-Man and the new logo can peacefully coexist. So those who have a "soft-spot for the D-Man" can use it and those who dont like it can use something else. It would be nice if Bright decided one for us that want to support D but don't want a hand drawn character on their homepage. Having to many logos will also be a bother because that will just start confusion, especially since there have been other languages that have called themselves D if my memory serves. Manfred Nowak Wrote:DavidSwe wroteBright could select an official logotype
by kindly asking what might be wrong with his D-Man. -manfred
Feb 28 2007
I think most of us have a soft spot for the D-man, the improved D-man at http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?Logo gets my vote. Charlie DavidSwe wrote:It would be nice if Bright could select an official logotype that could be used for promoting purposes. I found alot of nice logos at: http://www.sukimashita.com/d/ http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?Logo
Feb 27 2007
I posted these a while back. Not quite as good as the original however they still have that programmer art flavor. They are free to use. http://www.joelsprojects.com/d/MrD/DMan.html -Joel
Feb 27 2007
janderson wrote:I posted these a while back. Not quite as good as the original however they still have that programmer art flavor. They are free to use. http://www.joelsprojects.com/d/MrD/DMan.html -Joel
whoops, try this: http://www.joelsprojects.com/d/DMan.htm
Feb 27 2007
DavidSwe wrote:It would be nice if Bright could select an official logotype that could be used for promoting purposes. I found alot of nice logos at:
http://www.sukimashita.com/d/
I'll definitely go for the first of the variant 4(=D). Wolfgang Draxinger -- E-Mail address works, Jabber: hexarith jabber.org, ICQ: 134682867
Feb 28 2007









Jascha Wetzel <"[firstname]" mainia.de> 