www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - FreeImage library

reply question <manyquestion question.net> writes:
hi,

did anyone already do a wrapper for the FreeImage library??

"
FreeImage is an Open Source library project for developers who would like to
support popular graphics image formats like PNG, BMP, JPEG, TIFF and others as
needed by today's multimedia applications. FreeImage is easy to use, fast,
multithreading safe, compatible with all 32-bit versions of Windows, and
cross-platform (works both with Linux and Mac OS X).
"
Nov 13 2007
parent reply TomD <t_demmer nospam.web.de> writes:
Bill Baxter Wrote:

 Jascha Wetzel wrote:
 question wrote:
 hi,

 did anyone already do a wrapper for the FreeImage library??

 "
 FreeImage is an Open Source library project for developers who would 
 like to support popular graphics image formats like PNG, BMP, JPEG, 
 TIFF and others as needed by today's multimedia applications. 
 FreeImage is easy to use, fast, multithreading safe, compatible with 
 all 32-bit versions of Windows, and cross-platform (works both with 
 Linux and Mac OS X).
 "
the wrapper class is very rudimentary, but the header file port is fine.
Nice. Maybe you could stick it in the bindings project? www.dsource.org/projects/bindings Anyone with a dsource login can check things in there. --bb
I have done bindings fpr pthreads (win32) and portaudio. Does it make sense to put them there too? Ciao TomD
Nov 13 2007
parent reply question <manyquestion question.net> writes:
TomD Wrote:

whow - neat. we are doing a dicom project.
i hope the final const comes about - we do not want to use 1.0.

i have been lurking for gtk ..., but nothing seems to go with images and the
like. Jascha Wetzel seems to be porting tango to 2.0 and so we are willing to
use 2.0. one thing thats badly needed is database stuff like firebird.

 Bill Baxter Wrote:
 
 Jascha Wetzel wrote:
 question wrote:
 hi,

 did anyone already do a wrapper for the FreeImage library??

 "
 FreeImage is an Open Source library project for developers who would 
 like to support popular graphics image formats like PNG, BMP, JPEG, 
 TIFF and others as needed by today's multimedia applications. 
 FreeImage is easy to use, fast, multithreading safe, compatible with 
 all 32-bit versions of Windows, and cross-platform (works both with 
 Linux and Mac OS X).
 "
the wrapper class is very rudimentary, but the header file port is fine.
Nice. Maybe you could stick it in the bindings project? www.dsource.org/projects/bindings Anyone with a dsource login can check things in there. --bb
I have done bindings fpr pthreads (win32) and portaudio. Does it make sense to put them there too? Ciao TomD
Nov 13 2007
next sibling parent reply question <manyquestion question.net> writes:
i think i should clarify one thing. tango is a necessary evil. much rather use
phobos, but it does not have all the goodies of tango yet. we are searching
anything that can be run with phobos (port of the hashmap etc to phobos from
tango).


question Wrote:

 TomD Wrote:
 
 whow - neat. we are doing a dicom project.
 i hope the final const comes about - we do not want to use 1.0.
 
 i have been lurking for gtk ..., but nothing seems to go with images and the
like. Jascha Wetzel seems to be porting tango to 2.0 and so we are willing to
use 2.0. one thing thats badly needed is database stuff like firebird.
 
 Bill Baxter Wrote:
 
 Jascha Wetzel wrote:
 question wrote:
 hi,

 did anyone already do a wrapper for the FreeImage library??

 "
 FreeImage is an Open Source library project for developers who would 
 like to support popular graphics image formats like PNG, BMP, JPEG, 
 TIFF and others as needed by today's multimedia applications. 
 FreeImage is easy to use, fast, multithreading safe, compatible with 
 all 32-bit versions of Windows, and cross-platform (works both with 
 Linux and Mac OS X).
 "
the wrapper class is very rudimentary, but the header file port is fine.
Nice. Maybe you could stick it in the bindings project? www.dsource.org/projects/bindings Anyone with a dsource login can check things in there. --bb
I have done bindings fpr pthreads (win32) and portaudio. Does it make sense to put them there too? Ciao TomD
Nov 13 2007
parent reply BCS <ao pathlink.com> writes:
Reply to question,

 i think i should clarify one thing. tango is a necessary evil. much
 rather use phobos, but it does not have all the goodies of tango yet.
 we are searching anything that can be run with phobos (port of the
 hashmap etc to phobos from tango).
 
what do you have against tango? If tango was shipped with DMD would you also have an issue with it? I'm not being defensive, I'm just wondering.
Nov 13 2007
parent reply Bowl of petunias <bowl h2g2.foobar.co.uk> writes:
BCS Wrote:

 Reply to question,
 
 i think i should clarify one thing. tango is a necessary evil. much
 rather use phobos, but it does not have all the goodies of tango yet.
 we are searching anything that can be run with phobos (port of the
 hashmap etc to phobos from tango).
 
what do you have against tango? If tango was shipped with DMD would you also have an issue with it? I'm not being defensive, I'm just wondering.
Oh no! not again!
Nov 14 2007
parent BCS <ao pathlink.com> writes:
Reply to Bowl,

 BCS Wrote:
 
 Reply to question,
 
 i think i should clarify one thing. tango is a necessary evil. much
 rather use phobos, but it does not have all the goodies of tango
 yet. we are searching anything that can be run with phobos (port of
 the hashmap etc to phobos from tango).
 
what do you have against tango? If tango was shipped with DMD would you also have an issue with it? I'm not being defensive, I'm just wondering.
Oh no! not again!
For what it's worth, I don't use tango. The OP just stated a strong opinion without any stated rational, I was just wondering what the rational was.
Nov 14 2007
prev sibling next sibling parent Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar igesund.net> writes:
question wrote:

 TomD Wrote:
 
 whow - neat. we are doing a dicom project.
 i hope the final const comes about - we do not want to use 1.0.
 
 i have been lurking for gtk ..., but nothing seems to go with images and
 the like. Jascha Wetzel seems to be porting tango to 2.0 and so we are
 willing to use 2.0. one thing thats badly needed is database stuff like
 firebird.
 
Jascha haven't been involved in our 2.0 branch so far ... he certainly is helping us in other respects though. You want a database written in D? Or bindings like those in http://www.dsource.org/projects/ddbi ? -- Lars Ivar Igesund blog at http://larsivi.net DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi Dancing the Tango
Nov 14 2007
prev sibling parent Jascha Wetzel <firstname mainia.de> writes:
question wrote:
 Jascha Wetzel seems to be porting tango to 2.0 and so we are willing to use
2.0.
huh!? s/Jascha Wetzel/The Tango team/
Nov 14 2007