www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - F***ing captcha

reply "Daniel Kozak" <kozzi11 gmail.com> writes:
F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha
Jan 02 2014
next sibling parent "Daniel Kozak" <kozzi11 gmail.com> writes:
It is interesting, my normal message has been mark as spam, and I 
was unable to rewrite captcha for 8 times. But this message was 
OK :D
On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

Jan 02 2014
prev sibling next sibling parent "Adam D. Ruppe" <destructionator gmail.com> writes:
On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 F***ing captcha

amen
Jan 02 2014
prev sibling next sibling parent =?UTF-8?B?QWxpIMOHZWhyZWxp?= <acehreli yahoo.com> writes:
On 01/02/2014 12:14 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote:

 F***ing captcha

The hard to read letters are u, c, and k. :p Ali
Jan 02 2014
prev sibling next sibling parent "Brad Anderson" <eco gnuk.net> writes:
On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

Have you considered another possibility? http://i.imgur.com/e6kO4T1.jpg
Jan 02 2014
prev sibling next sibling parent Daniel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Koz=E1k?= <kozzi11 gmail.com> writes:
Brad Anderson píše v Čt 02. 01. 2014 v 23:14 +0000:
 On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

Have you considered another possibility? http://i.imgur.com/e6kO4T1.jpg

Jan 02 2014
prev sibling next sibling parent "JN" <666total wp.pl> writes:
On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 23:14:12 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
 On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing 
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing 
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing 
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

Have you considered another possibility? http://i.imgur.com/e6kO4T1.jpg

Brings back memories of that cat/dog RapidShare captcha *shivers*
Jan 02 2014
prev sibling next sibling parent =?UTF-8?B?U8O2bmtlIEx1ZHdpZw==?= <sludwig outerproduct.org> writes:
Am 02.01.2014 21:14, schrieb Daniel Kozak:
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

By the way, the Bayes filter that is used for the vibe.d forum has been about 99.93% correct so far (2 false negatives and no false positives since 3 months, when the final formula was put in place). I'm getting about 30 spam messages per day.
Jan 03 2014
prev sibling next sibling parent "Vladimir Panteleev" <vladimir thecybershadow.net> writes:
On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

Hi, The forum software used to have a bug where if you failed the first CAPTCHA, it would fail all successive CAPTCHA attempts for that post submission. It appears to still be fixed, though. I've tested CAPTCHA functionality just now, and it seems to be working properly. I've tried about 5 times and only once I got a challenge with an unclear solution. If you get a challenge and you're not confident in your solution, it's better to click the arrow-circle button to get a different challenge. I've checked the logs for the past month, and it seems that, with all the other spam-preventive measures in place, Akismet is now more effective at generating false positives than at actually blocking spam. (It has something against Mono-D in particular, it seems.) I'm going to try sending feedback of the false positives so far, hopefully that will "teach" it that such posts are not spam. If that doesn't work, I'll disable it entirely or look into replacing it with something else.
Jan 03 2014
prev sibling next sibling parent =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_Koz=C3=A1k?= <kozzi11 gmail.com> writes:
Thanks, maybe I was too tired and do not read carefully the captcha ;-).

Dne Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:19:43 +0100 Vladimir Panteleev  
<vladimir thecybershadow.net> napsal(a):

 On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing  
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha  
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing  
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha  
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

Hi, The forum software used to have a bug where if you failed the first CAPTCHA, it would fail all successive CAPTCHA attempts for that post submission. It appears to still be fixed, though. I've tested CAPTCHA functionality just now, and it seems to be working properly. I've tried about 5 times and only once I got a challenge with an unclear solution. If you get a challenge and you're not confident in your solution, it's better to click the arrow-circle button to get a different challenge. I've checked the logs for the past month, and it seems that, with all the other spam-preventive measures in place, Akismet is now more effective at generating false positives than at actually blocking spam. (It has something against Mono-D in particular, it seems.) I'm going to try sending feedback of the false positives so far, hopefully that will "teach" it that such posts are not spam. If that doesn't work, I'll disable it entirely or look into replacing it with something else.

-- Vytvořeno poštovní aplikací Opery: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Jan 03 2014
prev sibling parent "Szymon Gatner" <noemail gmail.com> writes:
On Friday, 3 January 2014 at 09:35:54 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
 Thanks, maybe I was too tired and do not read carefully the 
 captcha ;-).

 Dne Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:19:43 +0100 Vladimir Panteleev 
 <vladimir thecybershadow.net> napsal(a):

 On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak 
 wrote:
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing 
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing 
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha 
 F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing 
 captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha

Hi, The forum software used to have a bug where if you failed the first CAPTCHA, it would fail all successive CAPTCHA attempts for that post submission. It appears to still be fixed, though. I've tested CAPTCHA functionality just now, and it seems to be working properly. I've tried about 5 times and only once I got a challenge with an unclear solution. If you get a challenge and you're not confident in your solution, it's better to click the arrow-circle button to get a different challenge. I've checked the logs for the past month, and it seems that, with all the other spam-preventive measures in place, Akismet is now more effective at generating false positives than at actually blocking spam. (It has something against Mono-D in particular, it seems.) I'm going to try sending feedback of the false positives so far, hopefully that will "teach" it that such posts are not spam. If that doesn't work, I'll disable it entirely or look into replacing it with something else.


They are obviously 'o' 'r' and 'k' most likely related to Git.
Jan 03 2014