• Frank Benoit (8/8) Mar 08 2008 int[] a1, a2;
• Jarrett Billingsley (5/13) Mar 08 2008 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/expression.html
• Walter Bright (3/14) Mar 08 2008 Currently order of evaluation dependencies are illegal in D. Did you run...
• Frank Benoit (4/9) Mar 08 2008 Yes, see 2. + 3. change
• Walter Bright (3/11) Mar 08 2008 My old C eyes are pretty sensitive to that, too. But it's also clear

Frank Benoit <keinfarbton googlemail.com> writes:

int[] a1, a2;
// ....

int idx = 0;
a1[idx] = a2[idx++];

In Java this has another result like in D.
Java will evaluate from left to right, D does the increment befor doing 
the assignment, so the copied values go into different fields.

Is this a bug or design decision?

"Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> writes:

"Frank Benoit" <keinfarbton googlemail.com> wrote in message 
news:fqubu4$2d2e$1 digitalmars.com...
 int[] a1, a2;
 // ....

 int idx = 0;
 a1[idx] = a2[idx++];

 In Java this has another result like in D.
 Java will evaluate from left to right, D does the increment befor doing 
 the assignment, so the copied values go into different fields.

 Is this a bug or design decision?

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/expression.html

Very first section.  It's illegal code but it's up to the compiler to detect 
it or not.  I guess you could file a bug about it as "accepts-invalid". 

Walter Bright <newshound1 digitalmars.com> writes:

Frank Benoit wrote:
 int[] a1, a2;
 // ....
 
 int idx = 0;
 a1[idx] = a2[idx++];
 
 In Java this has another result like in D.
 Java will evaluate from left to right, D does the increment befor doing 
 the assignment, so the copied values go into different fields.
 
 Is this a bug or design decision?

Currently order of evaluation dependencies are illegal in D. Did you run 
across it in some Java code?

Frank Benoit <keinfarbton googlemail.com> writes:

Walter Bright schrieb:
 Frank Benoit wrote:
 Is this a bug or design decision?

 
 Currently order of evaluation dependencies are illegal in D. Did you run 
 across it in some Java code?

Yes, see 2. + 3. change
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwt-linux/changeset/204%3A8ab2f71515ba

My eyes will be more sensible for this patterns now :)

Walter Bright <newshound1 digitalmars.com> writes:

Frank Benoit wrote:
 Walter Bright schrieb:
 Currently order of evaluation dependencies are illegal in D. Did you 
 run across it in some Java code?

 
 Yes, see 2. + 3. change
 http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwt-linux/changeset/204%3A8ab2f71515ba
 
 My eyes will be more sensible for this patterns now :)

My old C eyes are pretty sensitive to that, too. But it's also clear 
that D should move to a defined left-to-right order-of-evaluation semantic.