digitalmars.D - DMD and Solaris
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alex_R=F8nne_Petersen?= <alex lycus.org> Jun 19 2012
- Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com> Jun 19 2012
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alex_R=F8nne_Petersen?= <alex lycus.org> Jun 19 2012
- Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com> Jun 19 2012
- Moritz Warning <moritzwarning web.de> Jun 19 2012
- "Paulo Pinto" <pjmlp progtools.org> Jun 21 2012
- Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com> Jun 21 2012
- "Paulo Pinto" <pjmlp progtools.org> Jun 22 2012
- Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> Jun 22 2012
- Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw ubuntu.com> Jun 19 2012
Hi, I think we need to be clear on this: Does DMD support Solaris? I would expect GDC and LDC to support it, but it doesn't seem like there's any maintained support for it in DMD. -- Alex Rønne Petersen alex lycus.org http://lycus.org
Jun 19 2012
On 6/19/2012 11:28 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:I think we need to be clear on this: Does DMD support Solaris? I would expect GDC and LDC to support it, but it doesn't seem like there's any maintained support for it in DMD.
Not anymore - Solaris is a dead end operating system.
Jun 19 2012
On 19-06-2012 22:05, Walter Bright wrote:On 6/19/2012 11:28 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:I think we need to be clear on this: Does DMD support Solaris? I would expect GDC and LDC to support it, but it doesn't seem like there's any maintained support for it in DMD.
Not anymore - Solaris is a dead end operating system.
OK. I think I'll submit some patches to remove Solaris code from DMD's druntime then. -- Alex Rønne Petersen alex lycus.org http://lycus.org
Jun 19 2012
On 6/19/2012 3:42 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:On 19-06-2012 22:05, Walter Bright wrote:On 6/19/2012 11:28 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:I think we need to be clear on this: Does DMD support Solaris? I would expect GDC and LDC to support it, but it doesn't seem like there's any maintained support for it in DMD.
Not anymore - Solaris is a dead end operating system.
OK. I think I'll submit some patches to remove Solaris code from DMD's druntime then.
I'd rather they were left in for now.
Jun 19 2012
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:42:23 +0200, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:On 19-06-2012 22:05, Walter Bright wrote:On 6/19/2012 11:28 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:I think we need to be clear on this: Does DMD support Solaris? I would expect GDC and LDC to support it, but it doesn't seem like there's any maintained support for it in DMD.
Not anymore - Solaris is a dead end operating system.
OK. I think I'll submit some patches to remove Solaris code from DMD's druntime then.
Solaris may be a dead end, but there are a few Solaris related OSs that are alive and going strong. Illumos comes to my mind.
Jun 19 2012
On Tuesday, 19 June 2012 at 20:06:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:On 6/19/2012 11:28 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:I think we need to be clear on this: Does DMD support Solaris? I would expect GDC and LDC to support it, but it doesn't seem like there's any maintained support for it in DMD.
Not anymore - Solaris is a dead end operating system.
Most enterprise customers we work with, seem to think otherwise. -- Paulo
Jun 21 2012
On 6/21/2012 10:56 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:On Tuesday, 19 June 2012 at 20:06:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:On 6/19/2012 11:28 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:I think we need to be clear on this: Does DMD support Solaris? I would expect GDC and LDC to support it, but it doesn't seem like there's any maintained support for it in DMD.
Not anymore - Solaris is a dead end operating system.
Most enterprise customers we work with, seem to think otherwise.
If someone wants to work on a Solaris port, I'm open to it.
Jun 21 2012
On Thursday, 21 June 2012 at 19:43:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:On 6/21/2012 10:56 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:On Tuesday, 19 June 2012 at 20:06:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:On 6/19/2012 11:28 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:I think we need to be clear on this: Does DMD support Solaris? I would expect GDC and LDC to support it, but it doesn't seem like there's any maintained support for it in DMD.
Not anymore - Solaris is a dead end operating system.
Most enterprise customers we work with, seem to think otherwise.
If someone wants to work on a Solaris port, I'm open to it.
Actually I did start one, several months ago, but did not do much more than change a few version() statements. Real life keeps getting in the way :)
Jun 22 2012
On Jun 21, 2012, at 10:56 AM, "Paulo Pinto" <pjmlp progtools.org> wrote:On Tuesday, 19 June 2012 at 20:06:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:On 6/19/2012 11:28 AM, Alex R=C3=B8nne Petersen wrote:I think we need to be clear on this: Does DMD support Solaris? I would e=
GDC and LDC to support it, but it doesn't seem like there's any maintain=
support for it in DMD.
Not anymore - Solaris is a dead end operating system.
Most enterprise customers we work with, seem to think otherwise.
I bet they wish it were a dead operating system though :-)=
Jun 22 2012
On 19 June 2012 21:05, Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com> wrote:On 6/19/2012 11:28 AM, Alex R=F8nne Petersen wrote:I think we need to be clear on this: Does DMD support Solaris? I would expect> GDC and LDC to support it, but it doesn't seem like there's any =
support for it in DMD.
Not anymore - Solaris is a dead end operating system.
It has been OpenSolaris, or latterly OpenIndiana that has been receiving most attention. --=20 Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) =3D (c & 0x0f) + '0';
Jun 19 2012









Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com> 