digitalmars.D - Coverity?
- S <S s.com> Nov 29 2007
- "Craig Black" <cblack ara.com> Nov 29 2007
- BCS <ao pathlink.com> Nov 29 2007
- S <S s.com> Nov 29 2007
- Robert Fraser <fraserofthenight gmail.com> Nov 29 2007
- Dan <murpsoft hotmail.com> Nov 29 2007
I'm curious what kind of results Coverity would produce from the D frontend? Anybody else curious?
Nov 29 2007
"S" <S s.com> wrote in message news:fin463$1gsb$1 digitalmars.com...I'm curious what kind of results Coverity would produce from the D frontend? Anybody else curious?
What is Coverity?
Nov 29 2007
Reply to Craig,"S" <S s.com> wrote in message news:fin463$1gsb$1 digitalmars.com...I'm curious what kind of results Coverity would produce from the D frontend? Anybody else curious?
a c/c++ static analisis tool http://www.coverity.com/
Nov 29 2007
Craig Black Wrote:"S" <S s.com> wrote in message news:fin463$1gsb$1 digitalmars.com...I'm curious what kind of results Coverity would produce from the D frontend? Anybody else curious?
What is Coverity?
http://scan.coverity.com/ It would be cool to submit the D frontend to this. I believe it's "Open Source" enough to get free analysis.
Nov 29 2007
S wrote:I'm curious what kind of results Coverity would produce from the D frontend? Anybody else curious?
Well, it doesn't use delete (almost at all), and the #1 problem in Descent's Java port of it is NPEs. So I'm guessing it'd fail pretty bad. More importantly, would anyone be interested in a Coverity-style null checker (i.e. not just a lint) for D?
Nov 29 2007
Robert Fraser Wrote:S wrote:I'm curious what kind of results Coverity would produce from the D frontend? Anybody else curious?
Well, it doesn't use delete (almost at all), and the #1 problem in Descent's Java port of it is NPEs. So I'm guessing it'd fail pretty bad. More importantly, would anyone be interested in a Coverity-style null checker (i.e. not just a lint) for D?
At the moment, I do most of my programming in an extended IDA Pro 5.1. I do this because it allows me to do machine-level call graphing with collapsing features and step-through debugging. I haven't had to compile more than once now since I started using it last year - no debugging, just analysis. While it's still far from perfect, it's better than standard "text+compiler" authoring a program. Not to sound arrogant, but my interest in D is sort of legacy to the days when I thought languages were significant.
Nov 29 2007









BCS <ao pathlink.com> 