• Michel Fortin (8/8) Sep 06 2009 I submitted a Phobos bug with a patch. Now I wonder: should I signal it
• Christopher Wright (5/10) Sep 06 2009 If it were assigned to someone, you should just wait for that person to
• Andrei Alexandrescu (4/9) Sep 06 2009 I can't test on OSX for the time being but I'll apply your changes "a

Michel Fortin <michel.fortin michelf.com> writes:

I submitted a Phobos bug with a patch. Now I wonder: should I signal it 
to someone or just leave it lying there until it's found and applied by 
someone?

(Here's the bug: <http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3298>.)

-- 
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin michelf.com
http://michelf.com/

Christopher Wright <dhasenan gmail.com> writes:

Michel Fortin wrote:
 I submitted a Phobos bug with a patch. Now I wonder: should I signal it 
 to someone or just leave it lying there until it's found and applied by 
 someone?
 
 (Here's the bug: <http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3298>.)

If it were assigned to someone, you should just wait for that person to 
handle it.

Andrei seems to handle most Phobos development, so I'd assign it to him. 
The worst that happens is that he reassigns it.

Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:

Michel Fortin wrote:
 I submitted a Phobos bug with a patch. Now I wonder: should I signal it 
 to someone or just leave it lying there until it's found and applied by 
 someone?
 
 (Here's the bug: <http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3298>.)

I can't test on OSX for the time being but I'll apply your changes "a 
l'aveugle".

Andrei