www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - About the new website

reply "Lloyd Dupont" <ld-REMOVE galador.net> writes:
Congrats, looks much nicer and appealing.
The library documentation seems more readable as well (in my humble 
opinion)! 
Jun 24 2011
next sibling parent Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com> writes:
On 6/24/2011 6:25 PM, Lloyd Dupont wrote:
 Congrats, looks much nicer and appealing.
 The library documentation seems more readable as well (in my humble opinion)!
I like it too! Thanks to David, Andrei, and all who helped create it.
Jun 24 2011
prev sibling parent reply dsimcha <dsimcha yahoo.com> writes:
On 6/24/2011 9:25 PM, Lloyd Dupont wrote:
 Congrats, looks much nicer and appealing.
 The library documentation seems more readable as well (in my humble
 opinion)!
Just one point I wanted to take this opportunity to mention: std.parallelism and std.net.isemail **STILL** aren't up on the new website.
Jun 25 2011
next sibling parent Thomas Mader <thomas.mader gmail.com> writes:
There is a small error on the index page.

There are currently four implementations:
*"There are currently four implementations:"*

but there are only *three* implementations listed.

Thomas

 There are currently four implementationsc
There are currently four implementations: There are currently four implementations: 1. Digital Mars dmd for Windows<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>, x86 Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS X<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>, and x86 FreeBSD <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>. 2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>. 3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>. There are currently four implementations: 1. Digital Mars dmd for Windows<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>, x86 Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS X<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>, and x86 FreeBSD <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>. 2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>. 3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>. There are currently four implementations:
    1. Digital Mars dmd for
Windows<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>,
    x86 Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS
X<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>,
    and x86 FreeBSD <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
    2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
    3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.
Jun 27 2011
prev sibling next sibling parent reply Thomas Mader <thomas.mader gmail.com> writes:
ok I should not use gmail for composing anymore. :)

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Thomas Mader <thomas.mader gmail.com>wrote:

 There is a small error on the index page.

 There are currently four implementations:
 *"There are currently four implementations:"*

 but there are only *three* implementations listed.

 Thomas

 There are currently four implementationsc
There are currently four implementations: There are currently four implementations: 1. Digital Mars dmd for Windows<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>, x86 Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS X<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>, and x86 FreeBSD <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>. 2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>. 3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>. There are currently four implementations: 1. Digital Mars dmd for Windows<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>, x86 Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS X<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>, and x86 FreeBSD <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>. 2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>. 3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>. There are currently four implementations:
    1. Digital Mars dmd for
Windows<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>,
    x86 Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS
X<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>,
    and x86 FreeBSD <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
    2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
    3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.
Jun 27 2011
parent KennyTM~ <kennytm gmail.com> writes:
On Jun 27, 11 19:32, Thomas Mader wrote:
 ok I should not use gmail for composing anymore. :)

 On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Thomas Mader <thomas.mader gmail.com
 <mailto:thomas.mader gmail.com>> wrote:

     There is a small error on the index page.

     There are currently four implementations:
     /"There are currently *four* implementations:"/

     but there are only *three* implementations listed.

     Thomas

         There are currently four implementationsc

     There are currently four implementations:

     There are currently four implementations:

      1. Digital Mars dmd for Windows
         <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>, x86 Linux
         <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS X
         <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>, and x86 FreeBSD
         <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
      2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
      3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.

     There are currently four implementations:

      1. Digital Mars dmd for Windows
         <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>, x86 Linux
         <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS X
         <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>, and x86 FreeBSD
         <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
      2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
      3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.

         There are currently four implementations:

          1. Digital Mars dmd for Windows
             <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>, x86
             Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac
             OS X <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>, and
             x86 FreeBSD
             <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
          2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
          3. Gnu D compiler gdc
             <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/index.html: 4. D.NET compiler alpha for .NET for D version 2. <http://dnet.codeplex.com/> However, this is no longer updated starting from 2009, so I don't think this should be listed in d-p-l.org.
Jun 27 2011
prev sibling next sibling parent "Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg gmx.com> writes:
On 2011-06-27 04:31, Thomas Mader wrote:
 There is a small error on the index page.
If you see any errors on the website, you should report them in bugzilla: d.puremagic.com/issues - Jonathan M Davis
Jun 27 2011
prev sibling next sibling parent Thomas Mader <thomas.mader gmail.com> writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6219

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com>wrote:

 On 2011-06-27 04:31, Thomas Mader wrote:
 There is a small error on the index page.
If you see any errors on the website, you should report them in bugzilla: d.puremagic.com/issues - Jonathan M Davis
Jun 28 2011
prev sibling parent "Lars T. Kyllingstad" <public kyllingen.NOSPAMnet> writes:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 18:39:25 -0400, dsimcha wrote:

 On 6/24/2011 9:25 PM, Lloyd Dupont wrote:
 Congrats, looks much nicer and appealing. The library documentation
 seems more readable as well (in my humble opinion)!
Just one point I wanted to take this opportunity to mention: std.parallelism and std.net.isemail **STILL** aren't up on the new website.
I fixed this a little while ago: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/ pull/12 The web site just needs to be updated. -Lars
Jun 29 2011