digitalmars.D - A newer WinDBG version, please...
- A Bothe <info alexanderbothe.com> Jan 05 2010
- Walter Bright <newshound1 digitalmars.com> Jan 05 2010
- A Bothe <info alexanderbothe.com> Jan 05 2010
- BCS <none anon.com> Jan 05 2010
- Bane <branimir.milosavljevic gmail.com> Jan 05 2010
- Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> Jan 05 2010
- "Denis Koroskin" <2korden gmail.com> Jan 05 2010
- Don <nospam nospam.com> Jan 05 2010
- torhu <no spam.invalid> Jan 05 2010
Like I wrote in the D.Debuggers forum: Hi everyone, after seeking for symbolic debuggers for D I noticed that there's a newer version of WinDBG http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/devtools/debugging/installx86.Mspx I tried this one with the latest (D 2.0.3.7) DMD version and it worked! http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/windbg.html says that other versions of WinDBG don't work ...so why don't pack this new version into the DMD .zip ?
Jan 05 2010
A Bothe wrote:Like I wrote in the D.Debuggers forum: Hi everyone, after seeking for symbolic debuggers for D I noticed that there's a newer version of WinDBG http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/devtools/debugging/installx86.Mspx I tried this one with the latest (D 2.0.3.7) DMD version and it worked! http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/windbg.html says that other versions of WinDBG don't work ...so why don't pack this new version into the DMD .zip ?
The installer is 17Mb for one reason :-(
Jan 05 2010
Walter Bright Wrote:A Bothe wrote:Like I wrote in the D.Debuggers forum: Hi everyone, after seeking for symbolic debuggers for D I noticed that there's a newer version of WinDBG http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/devtools/debugging/installx86.Mspx I tried this one with the latest (D 2.0.3.7) DMD version and it worked! http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/windbg.html says that other versions of WinDBG don't work ...so why don't pack this new version into the DMD .zip ?
The installer is 17Mb for one reason :-(
Hmm... but anyway a link to the Microsoft site would also be enough
Jan 05 2010
Hello A,Walter Bright Wrote:A Bothe wrote:Like I wrote in the D.Debuggers forum: Hi everyone, after seeking for symbolic debuggers for D I noticed that there's a newer version of WinDBG http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/devtools/debugging/installx86.Mspx I tried this one with the latest (D 2.0.3.7) DMD version and it worked! http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/windbg.html says that other versions of WinDBG don't work ...so why don't pack this new version into the DMD .zip ?
I haven't tried it yet, but if it's better than the old thing; Yes, please! The poor state of debugging in D is IMHO one of the major roadblocks.
Jan 05 2010
Bane <branimir.milosavljevic gmail.com> BCS Wrote:Hello A,Walter Bright Wrote:A Bothe wrote:Like I wrote in the D.Debuggers forum: Hi everyone, after seeking for symbolic debuggers for D I noticed that there's a newer version of WinDBG http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/devtools/debugging/installx86.Mspx I tried this one with the latest (D 2.0.3.7) DMD version and it worked! http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/windbg.html says that other versions of WinDBG don't work ...so why don't pack this new version into the DMD .zip ?
I haven't tried it yet, but if it's better than the old thing; Yes, please! The poor state of debugging in D is IMHO one of the major roadblocks.
Bah. Real programmers don't need to debug their programs :)
Jan 05 2010
BCS Wrote:Hello A,Walter Bright Wrote:A Bothe wrote:Like I wrote in the D.Debuggers forum: Hi everyone, after seeking for symbolic debuggers for D I noticed that there's a newer version of WinDBG http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/devtools/debugging/installx86.Mspx I tried this one with the latest (D 2.0.3.7) DMD version and it worked! http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/windbg.html says that other versions of WinDBG don't work ...so why don't pack this new version into the DMD .zip ?
I haven't tried it yet, but if it's better than the old thing; Yes, please! The poor state of debugging in D is IMHO one of the major roadblocks.
I recall DDBG being pretty nice. Or isn't it maintained any longer?
Jan 05 2010
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:44:54 +0300, Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> wrote:BCS Wrote:Hello A,Walter Bright Wrote:A Bothe wrote:Like I wrote in the D.Debuggers forum: Hi everyone, after seeking for symbolic debuggers for D I noticed that there's a newer version of WinDBG http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/devtools/debugging/installx86.Mspx I tried this one with the latest (D 2.0.3.7) DMD version and it worked! http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/windbg.html says that other versions of WinDBG don't work ...so why don't pack this new version into the DMD .zip ?
I haven't tried it yet, but if it's better than the old thing; Yes, please! The poor state of debugging in D is IMHO one of the major roadblocks.
I recall DDBG being pretty nice. Or isn't it maintained any longer?
ddbg is, indeed, very good, but last update to it was 2 years ago.
Jan 05 2010
A Bothe wrote:Like I wrote in the D.Debuggers forum: Hi everyone, after seeking for symbolic debuggers for D I noticed that there's a newer version of WinDBG http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/devtools/debugging/installx86.Mspx I tried this one with the latest (D 2.0.3.7) DMD version and it worked!
Is there a trick to getting it to work? I've tried to use it to debug DMD itself, but I only get a disassembly listing.http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/windbg.html says that other versions of WinDBG don't work ...so why don't pack this new version into the DMD .zip ?
Jan 05 2010
On 05.01.2010 10:27, A Bothe wrote:Like I wrote in the D.Debuggers forum: Hi everyone, after seeking for symbolic debuggers for D I noticed that there's a newer version of WinDBG http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/devtools/debugging/installx86.Mspx I tried this one with the latest (D 2.0.3.7) DMD version and it worked! http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/windbg.html says that other versions of WinDBG don't work ...so why don't pack this new version into the DMD .zip ?
I've had great success with just using msvc 9, and this tool: http://www.dsource.org/projects/cv2pdb/wiki
Jan 05 2010