www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - DMD 0.96 release

reply "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:
Bug fixes.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
Jul 22 2004
next sibling parent reply Sean Kelly <sean f4.ca> writes:
Does this mean utf.d has been changed since 0.95?  And if so, were there any
changes to encode/decode?  (just wondering if I should rewrite the changes I
made based on what's in 0.96)

Sean
Jul 22 2004
parent Sean Kelly <sean f4.ca> writes:
In article <cdphin$171q$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Sean Kelly says...
Does this mean utf.d has been changed since 0.95?  And if so, were there any
changes to encode/decode?  (just wondering if I should rewrite the changes I
made based on what's in 0.96)

Never mind, they compare the same in a diff. Sean
Jul 22 2004
prev sibling next sibling parent reply Ant <duitoolkit yahoo.ca> writes:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:42:06 -0700, Walter wrote:

 Bug fixes.
 
 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

from d change log for 0.96
 Added exec* functions to std.process. (thanks to Matthew Wilson)

my linux system doesn't have execvpe, from http://haskell.cs.yale.edu/ghc/docs/5.02.3/set/process-primitives.html (the first one that come up from google) "Note that execvpe is not provided by the POSIX standard, and must be written by hand." do we really want it to be on phobos like it is now? Ant
Jul 24 2004
parent "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:
"Ant" <duitoolkit yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.07.24.21.54.49.545093 yahoo.ca...
 On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:42:06 -0700, Walter wrote:

 Bug fixes.

 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

from d change log for 0.96
 Added exec* functions to std.process. (thanks to Matthew Wilson)

my linux system doesn't have execvpe, from http://haskell.cs.yale.edu/ghc/docs/5.02.3/set/process-primitives.html (the first one that come up from google) "Note that execvpe is not provided by the POSIX standard, and must be written by hand." do we really want it to be on phobos like it is now?

Hmm. I guess it needs revisiting.
Jul 25 2004
prev sibling next sibling parent reply "Daniel Kos" <unodgs tlen.pl> writes:
DWT from dsource.org still crashes the compiler when I try to compile the  
project.
Dnia Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:42:06 -0700, Walter <newshound digitalmars.com>  
napisał:

 Bug fixes.

 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

-- uno (unodgs tlen.pl)
Jul 24 2004
parent J C Calvarese <jcc7 cox.net> writes:
Daniel Kos wrote:
 DWT from dsource.org still crashes the compiler when I try to compile 
 the  project.

Ummm. You might want to talk to the DWT team about that: http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=1 (By the way, they've been trying to get it to compile, too.)
 Dnia Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:42:06 -0700, Walter 
 <newshound digitalmars.com>  napisał:
 
 Bug fixes.

 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html


-- Justin (a/k/a jcc7) http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/
Jul 24 2004
prev sibling parent reply Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> writes:
Walter wrote:

 Bug fixes.
 
 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

"Added std.perf (thanks to Matthew Wilson)" We have quite a few undocumented bits of Phobos already, but it's something of an occasion to see a whole module undocumented. Is this going to be fixed soon? "Fixed mishandling of out parameters in variadic functions." Unless I keep blinking, I don't see anything on how to use inout/out variadically. Or is this talking about out among the fixed parameters preceding the ...? We could actually do with inout/out variadicity, perhaps with the obvious syntax void qwert(out ...); at least if we're going to eventually create a successor to scanf. And please see digitalmars.D/5809 (sorry, I meant to post that on d.D.bugs) digitalmars.D/5810 Stewart. -- My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox, aside from its being the unfortunate victim of intensive mail-bombing at the moment. Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.
Jul 26 2004
parent "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:
"Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ce2n03$oi2$2 digitaldaemon.com...
 Walter wrote:

 Bug fixes.

 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

"Added std.perf (thanks to Matthew Wilson)" We have quite a few undocumented bits of Phobos already, but it's something of an occasion to see a whole module undocumented. Is this going to be fixed soon?

Matthew has promised to write the .html bit for it.
 "Fixed mishandling of out parameters in variadic functions."

 Unless I keep blinking, I don't see anything on how to use inout/out
 variadically.  Or is this talking about out among the fixed parameters
 preceding the ...?

The latter. There was a reported bug with out parameters appearing before the ...
 And please see

 digitalmars.D/5809
 (sorry, I meant to post that on d.D.bugs)
 digitalmars.D/5810

Thanks!
Jul 26 2004