www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - Please Include Dynamic class loading and Dynamic class loading

reply Ramakrishna <Ramakrishna_member pathlink.com> writes:
Hi D-lang Developpers,

I Appreciate your effort in implementing D-language to overcome drawbacks of C
and C++. But I have some concerns in this, 

1.I don't know Why you are not supporting Multiple Inheritance?
In C++ way of multiple Inheritance is required ans it is programmer to use also.

2.Dynamic class loading is required. Please Include this in your D-language.

I wish this D-language will get more popularity and Wide area of applicable.
I wish you all Success, Good luck...
Apr 03 2006
next sibling parent Kyle Furlong <kylefurlong gmail.com> writes:
Ramakrishna wrote:

 Hi D-lang Developpers,
 
 I Appreciate your effort in implementing D-language to overcome drawbacks of C
 and C++. But I have some concerns in this, 
 
 1.I don't know Why you are not supporting Multiple Inheritance?
 In C++ way of multiple Inheritance is required ans it is programmer to use
also.
 


Have you looked at mixins? http://www.digitalmars.com/d/mixin.html


 2.Dynamic class loading is required. Please Include this in your D-language.
 


While not complete, DDL at www.dsource.org is heading in this direction.
Perhaps you would like to lend a hand if it is 
essential to you.


 I wish this D-language will get more popularity and Wide area of applicable.
 I wish you all Success, Good luck...
 
 
 


:)
Apr 04 2006
prev sibling parent pragma <pragma_member pathlink.com> writes:
In article <e0ssav$2pmc$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Ramakrishna says...

Hi D-lang Developpers,

I Appreciate your effort in implementing D-language to overcome drawbacks of C
and C++. But I have some concerns in this, 

1.I don't know Why you are not supporting Multiple Inheritance?
In C++ way of multiple Inheritance is required ans it is programmer to use also.


While I cannot speak for the exact design decisions behind not supporting MI, I
can say that everyone is getting along very well without it.  IMO, there are
exceedingly few cases where MI actually solves a problem without needlessly
complicating things for developers.

D has an amazing feature that functions well as a workaround: mixins.  Combining
mixins with interfaces will give you most of what you crave from MI, without any
of the "what overrides what" issues that C++'s MI implementation gives you. :)


2.Dynamic class loading is required. Please Include this in your D-language.


The DDL project over on dsource (www.dsource.org/projects/ddl) is moving
steadily toward this goal.  The intermediate goals of dynamic loading and
linking, in a cross-platform manner, are nearly complete which will set the
stage nicely for dynamic class loading and true reflection. I have prepared a
little more information on things over on the project page itself, so please
drop in and take a look. 


I wish this D-language will get more popularity and Wide area of applicable.
I wish you all Success, Good luck...


Thank you.  Please consider helping us out with making D a success.  There are
many active projects over on dsource.org that are always in need of testers and
contributors.  The scene here is pretty friendly - just ask to help!

- EricAnderton at yahoo
Apr 04 2006