• S. Chancellor <dnewsgr mephit.kicks-ass.org> Feb 12 2006
• Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar igesund.net> Feb 12 2006
• John Demme <me teqdruid.com> Feb 12 2006
• bobef <bobef lessequal.com> Feb 13 2006
• nick <nick.atamas gmail.com> Feb 12 2006

S. Chancellor <dnewsgr mephit.kicks-ass.org> writes:

What was the consensus on DWT or whatever?  While i'd love to read the 
100+ posts in that thread, can somebody give me the short answer?

-S.

Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar igesund.net> writes:

S. Chancellor wrote:

 What was the consensus on DWT or whatever?  While i'd love to read the
 100+ posts in that thread, can somebody give me the short answer?
 
 -S.


Hmm, you might check out the new newsgroup, digitalmars.D.dwt, but in
general the consensus was 'maybe'.

John Demme <me teqdruid.com> writes:

Heh... In a room of 10 D users, how many opinions do you think you'd have?

Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:

 S. Chancellor wrote:
 
 What was the consensus on DWT or whatever?  While i'd love to read the
 100+ posts in that thread, can somebody give me the short answer?
 
 -S.


 Hmm, you might check out the new newsgroup, digitalmars.D.dwt, but in
 general the consensus was 'maybe'.

bobef <bobef lessequal.com> writes:

John Demme wrote:
 Heh... In a room of 10 D users, how many opinions do you think you'd have?


Two ;]

nick <nick.atamas gmail.com> writes:

S. Chancellor wrote:
 What was the consensus on DWT or whatever?  While i'd love to read the
 100+ posts in that thread, can somebody give me the short answer?
 
 -S.
 


Some really good argument were made for DWT and it's probably going to
be developed. So I would say "probably" rather than "maybe".