• Questiom <Questiom_member pathlink.com> Sep 30 2005
• bobef <bobef lessequal.com> Sep 30 2005
• "Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> Sep 30 2005
• Ivan Senji <ivan.senji_REMOVE_ _THIS__gmail.com> Oct 01 2005
• "Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> Oct 01 2005

Questiom <Questiom_member pathlink.com> writes:

for example


char []a=new char[55];

Does the 'new' operator fill the array with 0 or can there be some crap in a[]?
I could not find it from specification.

Does anybody know?

bobef <bobef lessequal.com> writes:

Questiom wrote:
 for example
 
 
 char []a=new char[55];
 
 Does the 'new' operator fill the array with 0 or can there be some crap in a[]?
 I could not find it from specification.
 
 Does anybody know?
 
 


Specs says, if I remember correctly, that all variables in D are 
automatically initialized (if they are not void initialized or whatever 
it was called).

"Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> writes:

"Questiom" <Questiom_member pathlink.com> wrote in message 
news:dhk1ur$26bt$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Does the 'new' operator fill the array with 0 or can there be some crap in 
 a[]?
 I could not find it from specification.

 Does anybody know?


Yes, it is filled with the type's initializer (in this case 0). 

Ivan Senji <ivan.senji_REMOVE_ _THIS__gmail.com> writes:

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
 "Questiom" <Questiom_member pathlink.com> wrote in message 
 news:dhk1ur$26bt$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 
Does the 'new' operator fill the array with 0 or can there be some crap in 
a[]?
I could not find it from specification.

Does anybody know?


 
 Yes, it is filled with the type's initializer (in this case 0). 
 


Char is initialied with 0xFF not 0.

"Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> writes:

"Ivan Senji" <ivan.senji_REMOVE_ _THIS__gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:dhmaeu$l6g$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Char is initialied with 0xFF not 0.


Crap.  Forgot about that.