• bobef <bobef_member pathlink.com> Sep 03 2005
• James Dunne <james.jdunne gmail.com> Sep 04 2005
• bobef <bobef_member pathlink.com> Sep 04 2005
• James Dunne <james.jdunne gmail.com> Sep 05 2005
• bobef <bobef_member pathlink.com> Sep 05 2005

bobef <bobef_member pathlink.com> writes:

I've seen these files in the dsource/bindings project. dparser.d dlexer.d... I
am wondering (because I plan to start writing intellisense support for akIDE
soon) has anyone used these and are there any examples?

James Dunne <james.jdunne gmail.com> writes:

bobef wrote:
 I've seen these files in the dsource/bindings project. dparser.d dlexer.d... I
 am wondering (because I plan to start writing intellisense support for akIDE
 soon) has anyone used these and are there any examples?
 
 


latest compiler revision, but could probably easily be updated to the 
latest code.  Some very small changes in converting the front-end's C++ 
code to D.

Anyway, that's the reason I wrote them - for some sort of intellisense 
support.  I don't think dparser.d is complete, but dlexer.d should be 
fine (albeit slightly out of date).  I'll check em out this weekend and 
see what I can hack up for you.

bobef <bobef_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <dffet0$2ln4$1 digitaldaemon.com>, James Dunne says...
bobef wrote:
 I've seen these files in the dsource/bindings project. dparser.d dlexer.d... I
 am wondering (because I plan to start writing intellisense support for akIDE
 soon) has anyone used these and are there any examples?
 
 


latest compiler revision, but could probably easily be updated to the 
latest code.  Some very small changes in converting the front-end's C++ 
code to D.

Anyway, that's the reason I wrote them - for some sort of intellisense 
support.  I don't think dparser.d is complete, but dlexer.d should be 
fine (albeit slightly out of date).  I'll check em out this weekend and 
see what I can hack up for you.


If it is only for me better dont ;] 'soon' for me usualy is not very soon ;]
Anyway. What about an example how to use them? I am not even sure what is the
difference between lexer and parser (I don't even know the meaning of these
words (2lazy 2 look in the dictionary:)) but I know I need one (or both) of them
to make intellisence...

James Dunne <james.jdunne gmail.com> writes:

bobef wrote:
 In article <dffet0$2ln4$1 digitaldaemon.com>, James Dunne says...
 
bobef wrote:

I've seen these files in the dsource/bindings project. dparser.d dlexer.d... I
am wondering (because I plan to start writing intellisense support for akIDE
soon) has anyone used these and are there any examples?


I wrote them.  They're slightly out of date in parsing D code as of the 
latest compiler revision, but could probably easily be updated to the 
latest code.  Some very small changes in converting the front-end's C++ 
code to D.

Anyway, that's the reason I wrote them - for some sort of intellisense 
support.  I don't think dparser.d is complete, but dlexer.d should be 
fine (albeit slightly out of date).  I'll check em out this weekend and 
see what I can hack up for you.


 
 If it is only for me better dont ;] 'soon' for me usualy is not very soon ;]
 Anyway. What about an example how to use them? I am not even sure what is the
 difference between lexer and parser (I don't even know the meaning of these
 words (2lazy 2 look in the dictionary:)) but I know I need one (or both) of
them
 to make intellisence...
 
 


tokens, such as identifier, left-shift, double-equals, etc.  It filters 
out the white-space and reads in numeric literals (responsible for 
interpreting binary numbers, octal numbers, decimal numbers, hex 
numbers, etc.), among other things (counting lines, skipping comments).

The parser's job is to take the lexer's raw token stream and convert it 
into valid language elements: such as expressions, statements, 
declarations, etc.  It is from here that you probably want to start with 
intellisense, since you'll have the full tree of all classes, functions, 
interfaces, structs, typedefs, aliases, variables, expressions, etc. 
from the module, including all their relevant attributes and properties.

Hope this helped!

bobef <bobef_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <dfgv9m$pr2$1 digitaldaemon.com>, James Dunne says...
bobef wrote:
 In article <dffet0$2ln4$1 digitaldaemon.com>, James Dunne says...
 
bobef wrote:

I've seen these files in the dsource/bindings project. dparser.d dlexer.d... I
am wondering (because I plan to start writing intellisense support for akIDE
soon) has anyone used these and are there any examples?


I wrote them.  They're slightly out of date in parsing D code as of the 
latest compiler revision, but could probably easily be updated to the 
latest code.  Some very small changes in converting the front-end's C++ 
code to D.

Anyway, that's the reason I wrote them - for some sort of intellisense 
support.  I don't think dparser.d is complete, but dlexer.d should be 
fine (albeit slightly out of date).  I'll check em out this weekend and 
see what I can hack up for you.


 
 If it is only for me better dont ;] 'soon' for me usualy is not very soon ;]
 Anyway. What about an example how to use them? I am not even sure what is the
 difference between lexer and parser (I don't even know the meaning of these
 words (2lazy 2 look in the dictionary:)) but I know I need one (or both) of
them
 to make intellisence...
 
 


tokens, such as identifier, left-shift, double-equals, etc.  It filters 
out the white-space and reads in numeric literals (responsible for 
interpreting binary numbers, octal numbers, decimal numbers, hex 
numbers, etc.), among other things (counting lines, skipping comments).

The parser's job is to take the lexer's raw token stream and convert it 
into valid language elements: such as expressions, statements, 
declarations, etc.  It is from here that you probably want to start with 
intellisense, since you'll have the full tree of all classes, functions, 
interfaces, structs, typedefs, aliases, variables, expressions, etc. 
from the module, including all their relevant attributes and properties.

Hope this helped!



Yes. Very much. Thank you.