c++ - FTP path lengths
- "Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> May 31 2004
- "Zz" <Zz Zz.com> May 31 2004
- Scott Michel <scottm mordred.cs.ucla.edu> May 31 2004
- "Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> May 31 2004
- "Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> May 31 2004
- "Zz" <Zz Zz.com> May 31 2004
- "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> Jun 01 2004
- "Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> Jun 01 2004
- "Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> Jun 01 2004
- "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> Jun 01 2004
Anyone know if there's a hard limit for FTP url/file paths and, if so, what it is? Cheers Matthew
May 31 2004
In Internet Explorer it's 2,083 Characters. Zz "Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:c9gbm2$1ovo$1 digitaldaemon.com...Anyone know if there's a hard limit for FTP url/file paths and, if so,
is? Cheers Matthew
May 31 2004
In c++ Matthew <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote:Anyone know if there's a hard limit for FTP url/file paths and, if so, what it is?
If you're talking about a URL, none that I've been able to find. Same goes for the FTP RFC. So, no, probably not, except if your OS defines an upper limit on path names.
May 31 2004
Yeah, I've decided to not count any chickens. Thanks to you all for your prompt answers. :) Matthew "Scott Michel" <scottm mordred.cs.ucla.edu> wrote in message news:c9gc5p$1p2d$1 digitaldaemon.com...In c++ Matthew <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote:Anyone know if there's a hard limit for FTP url/file paths and, if so, what
is?
If you're talking about a URL, none that I've been able to find. Same goes for the FTP RFC. So, no, probably not, except if your OS defines an upper limit on path names.
May 31 2004
Here's an interesting twist. The doc for FtpGetCurrentDirectory() says
"Using a length of MAX_PATH is sufficient for all paths."
"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message
news:c9ghko$20n2$1 digitaldaemon.com...
Yeah, I've decided to not count any chickens.
Thanks to you all for your prompt answers.
:)
Matthew
"Scott Michel" <scottm mordred.cs.ucla.edu> wrote in message
news:c9gc5p$1p2d$1 digitaldaemon.com...
In c++ Matthew <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote:
Anyone know if there's a hard limit for FTP url/file paths and, if so, what
is?
If you're talking about a URL, none that I've been able to find. Same goes
the FTP RFC.
So, no, probably not, except if your OS defines an upper limit on path names.
May 31 2004
Looking at the question again for Internet Explorer its actually a maximum URL length of 2083 and a maximum path length of 2048. As far as I know there is no specified limit and some other products have different length. Zz "Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:c9gbm2$1ovo$1 digitaldaemon.com...Anyone know if there's a hard limit for FTP url/file paths and, if so,
is? Cheers Matthew
May 31 2004
"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:c9gbm2$1ovo$1 digitaldaemon.com...Anyone know if there's a hard limit for FTP url/file paths and, if so,
is?
The hard limit is when your stack buffer overflows and a virus gets written onto it.
Jun 01 2004
Yes, very good. ;) In fact, I've fixed up various assumptions of path length in STLSoft and recls, and there are now the classes basic_file_path_buffer in both WinSTL and UNIXSTL, which provide the appropriate sized buffers. For WinSTL, if the OS is NT, then it provides a buffer of 32001, 9x it provides 261. For UNIXSTL, if PATH_MAX is defined, then the length is 1 + PATH_MAX, otherwise it calls pathconf(). For InetSTL it's not assuming any length at all for most of the code, although things that deal with FTP directory lengths do assume _MAX_PATH, since that's documented in the WinInet API. "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c9ilrl$22iv$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:c9gbm2$1ovo$1 digitaldaemon.com...Anyone know if there's a hard limit for FTP url/file paths and, if so,
is?
The hard limit is when your stack buffer overflows and a virus gets written onto it.
Jun 01 2004
Yes, very good. ;) In fact, I've fixed up various assumptions of path length in STLSoft and recls, and there are now the classes basic_file_path_buffer in both WinSTL and UNIXSTL, which provide the appropriate sized buffers. For WinSTL, if the OS is NT, then it provides a buffer of 32001, 9x it provides 261. For UNIXSTL, if PATH_MAX is defined, then the length is 1 + PATH_MAX, otherwise it calls pathconf(). For InetSTL it's not assuming any length at all for most of the code, although things that deal with FTP directory lengths do assume _MAX_PATH, since that's documented in the WinInet API. btw, the next version of recls, which I'm working on right now, will allow FTP searches on Win32. (I'm using ftp.digitaldaemon.com as my test site <g>) I'll naturally be updating the D mapping. "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c9ilrl$22iv$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:c9gbm2$1ovo$1 digitaldaemon.com...Anyone know if there's a hard limit for FTP url/file paths and, if so,
is?
The hard limit is when your stack buffer overflows and a virus gets written onto it.
Jun 01 2004
The best approach is to do one's damdest in writing the code to avoid any need to even know the maximum path length. "Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:c9is50$2bft$1 digitaldaemon.com...Yes, very good. ;) In fact, I've fixed up various assumptions of path length in STLSoft and
and there are now the classes basic_file_path_buffer in both WinSTL and
which provide the appropriate sized buffers. For WinSTL, if the OS is NT,
provides a buffer of 32001, 9x it provides 261. For UNIXSTL, if PATH_MAX
defined, then the length is 1 + PATH_MAX, otherwise it calls pathconf(). For InetSTL it's not assuming any length at all for most of the code,
things that deal with FTP directory lengths do assume _MAX_PATH, since
documented in the WinInet API. btw, the next version of recls, which I'm working on right now, will allow
searches on Win32. (I'm using ftp.digitaldaemon.com as my test site <g>)
naturally be updating the D mapping.
Jun 01 2004









"Zz" <Zz Zz.com> 