digitalmars.D - Vote: Yes - I would like to see "immutable" in D
- Brad Beveridge <brad somewhere.net> Jun 30 2005
- Brad Beveridge <brad somewhere.net> Jun 30 2005
- xs0 <xs0 xs0.com> Jun 30 2005
- "Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> Jun 30 2005
- Niko Korhonen <niktheblak hotmail.com> Jun 30 2005
- Stefan Zobel <Stefan_member pathlink.com> Jun 30 2005
- Tom S <h3r3tic remove.mat.uni.torun.pl> Jun 30 2005
- AJG <AJG_member pathlink.com> Jun 30 2005
- Trevor Parscal <trevorparscal hotmail.com> Jun 30 2005
- "Andrew Fedoniouk" <news terrainformatica.com> Jun 30 2005
- "Regan Heath" <regan netwin.co.nz> Jun 30 2005
- "Ilya Zaitseff" <sark7 mail333.com> Jun 30 2005
- Eugene Pelekhay <pelekhay gmail.com> Jul 01 2005
- Jan-Eric Duden <jeduden whisset.com> Jul 01 2005
- "Tony" <talktotony email.com> Jul 01 2005
- Markus Dangl <danglm in.tum.de> Jul 02 2005
If you would like to see the concept of immutable data in D (as discussed in other threads), please simply reply to this message directly. Please do not discuss anything in this thread. I would like that people issue their vote by replying, hence only reply once. In this way the votes should be very easy to count. If you do not want to see D gain "immutable", or you think it is a waste of Walter's effort, please reply to the other "Vote: No" thread. Walter - if I have overstepped the purpose of the newsgroup with these posts, please delete them or make a posting that people not vote. Thanks Brad
Jun 30 2005
Brad Beveridge wrote:If you would like to see the concept of immutable data in D (as discussed in other threads), please simply reply to this message directly. Please do not discuss anything in this thread. I would like that people issue their vote by replying, hence only reply once. In this way the votes should be very easy to count. If you do not want to see D gain "immutable", or you think it is a waste of Walter's effort, please reply to the other "Vote: No" thread. Walter - if I have overstepped the purpose of the newsgroup with these posts, please delete them or make a posting that people not vote. Thanks Brad
Jun 30 2005
"Brad Beveridge" <brad somewhere.net> wrote in message news:da1bcv$1im8$1 digitaldaemon.com... Yep.
Jun 30 2005
In article <da1bcv$1im8$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Brad Beveridge says...If you would like to see the concept of immutable data in D (as discussed in other threads), please simply reply to this message directly. Please do not discuss anything in this thread. I would like that people issue their vote by replying, hence only reply once. In this way the votes should be very easy to count. If you do not want to see D gain "immutable", or you think it is a waste of Walter's effort, please reply to the other "Vote: No" thread. Walter - if I have overstepped the purpose of the newsgroup with these posts, please delete them or make a posting that people not vote. Thanks Brad
+1 Stefan
Jun 30 2005
Sometimes I'm missing const from C++... -- Tomasz Stachowiak /+ a.k.a. h3r3tic +/
Jun 30 2005
Yessireebob. In article <da1bcv$1im8$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Brad Beveridge says...If you would like to see the concept of immutable data in D (as discussed in other threads), please simply reply to this message directly. Please do not discuss anything in this thread. I would like that people issue their vote by replying, hence only reply once. In this way the votes should be very easy to count. If you do not want to see D gain "immutable", or you think it is a waste of Walter's effort, please reply to the other "Vote: No" thread. Walter - if I have overstepped the purpose of the newsgroup with these posts, please delete them or make a posting that people not vote. Thanks Brad
Jun 30 2005
Y - E - S -- Thanks, Trevor Parscal www.trevorparscal.com trevorparscal hotmail.com
Jun 30 2005
Brad Beveridge wrote:If you would like to see the concept of immutable data in D (as discussed in other threads), please simply reply to this message directly. Please do not discuss anything in this thread. I would like that people issue their vote by replying, hence only reply once. In this way the votes should be very easy to count. If you do not want to see D gain "immutable", or you think it is a waste of Walter's effort, please reply to the other "Vote: No" thread. Walter - if I have overstepped the purpose of the newsgroup with these posts, please delete them or make a posting that people not vote. Thanks Brad
Jul 01 2005
Yes "Brad Beveridge" <brad somewhere.net> wrote in message news:da1bcv$1im8$1 digitaldaemon.com...If you would like to see the concept of immutable data in D (as discussed in other threads), please simply reply to this message directly. Please do not discuss anything in this thread. I would like that people issue their vote by replying, hence only reply once. In this way the votes should be very easy to count. If you do not want to see D gain "immutable", or you think it is a waste of Walter's effort, please reply to the other "Vote: No" thread. Walter - if I have overstepped the purpose of the newsgroup with these posts, please delete them or make a posting that people not vote. Thanks Brad
Jul 01 2005
Brad Beveridge schrieb:If you would like to see the concept of immutable data in D (as discussed in other threads), please simply reply to this message directly. Please do not discuss anything in this thread. I would like that people issue their vote by replying, hence only reply once. In this way the votes should be very easy to count. If you do not want to see D gain "immutable", or you think it is a waste of Walter's effort, please reply to the other "Vote: No" thread. Walter - if I have overstepped the purpose of the newsgroup with these posts, please delete them or make a posting that people not vote. Thanks Brad
Yes.
Jul 02 2005









Brad Beveridge <brad somewhere.net> 