digitalmars.D - unittest for nested functions?
- Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.thisisspam.cn> Apr 19 2005
- "TechnoZeus" <TechnoZeus PeoplePC.com> Apr 20 2005
- Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.thisisspam.cn> Apr 20 2005
- "TechnoZeus" <TechnoZeus PeoplePC.com> Apr 21 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Should unittest in functions be allowed in future, so that static inner
functions can be tested?
# void outer(){
# static int inner(){
# return 0;
# }
#
# unittest{
# assert(inner()==0);
# }
# }
Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFCZe4h3w+/yD4P9tIRAsZiAKCqXhIB4zSoe5ctT4ALasyXGOZWbwCgqgyP
2FoEwP8wvVW7+OmDwJLUXP0=
=Tgr9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Apr 19 2005
Hmmm... Won't this work?...
unittest
{
function.test();
assert(foo);
//etc.
}
TZ
"Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop kuehne.thisisspam.cn> wrote in message
news:1a7hj2-uf6.ln1 lnews.kuehne.cn...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Should unittest in functions be allowed in future, so that static inner
functions can be tested?
# void outer(){
# static int inner(){
# return 0;
# }
#
# unittest{
# assert(inner()==0);
# }
# }
Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFCZe4h3w+/yD4P9tIRAsZiAKCqXhIB4zSoe5ctT4ALasyXGOZWbwCgqgyP
2FoEwP8wvVW7+OmDwJLUXP0=
=Tgr9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Apr 20 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 TechnoZeus schrieb am Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:17:18 -0500:Hmmm... Won't this work?... unittest { function.test(); assert(foo); //etc. } TZ "Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop kuehne.thisisspam.cn> wrote in message news:1a7hj2-uf6.ln1 lnews.kuehne.cn...Should unittest in functions be allowed in future, so that static inner functions can be tested? # void outer(){ # static int inner(){ # return 0; # } # # unittest{ # assert(inner()==0); # } # } Thomas
Nice catch. BTW where is this documented? Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFCZzUH3w+/yD4P9tIRAmtJAKDLEsvU5Kn6H+lE5ieti12ayULyOgCfVizx HVz4XAbnmB91AIwBYQGhmwY= =v0i6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Apr 20 2005
"TechnoZeus" <TechnoZeus PeoplePC.com> Don't know if it is documented. It just seemed to make sense. TZ "Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop kuehne.thisisspam.cn> wrote in message news:71pjj2-b54.ln1 lnews.kuehne.cn...-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 TechnoZeus schrieb am Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:17:18 -0500:Hmmm... Won't this work?... unittest { function.test(); assert(foo); //etc. } TZ "Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop kuehne.thisisspam.cn> wrote in message news:1a7hj2-uf6.ln1 lnews.kuehne.cn...Should unittest in functions be allowed in future, so that static inner functions can be tested? # void outer(){ # static int inner(){ # return 0; # } # # unittest{ # assert(inner()==0); # } # } Thomas
Nice catch. BTW where is this documented? Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFCZzUH3w+/yD4P9tIRAmtJAKDLEsvU5Kn6H+lE5ieti12ayULyOgCfVizx HVz4XAbnmB91AIwBYQGhmwY= =v0i6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Apr 21 2005