• Mehrdad <wfunction hotmail.com> Jul 24 2011
• KennyTM~ <kennytm gmail.com> Jul 24 2011
• Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com> Jul 24 2011
• Mehrdad <wfunction hotmail.com> Jul 24 2011

Mehrdad <wfunction hotmail.com> writes:

Hi!

Is 16-bit inline assembly possible with DMD? If not, would it be 
difficult to add the feature?
That way you might actually be able to write a boot loader in pure D. :)

KennyTM~ <kennytm gmail.com> writes:

On Jul 25, 11 02:14, Mehrdad wrote:
 Hi!

 Is 16-bit inline assembly possible with DMD? If not, would it be
 difficult to add the feature?
 That way you might actually be able to write a boot loader in pure D. :)


That's unlikely. D has no plan to support < 32-bit systems*.

http://d-programming-language.org/overview.html

Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com> writes:

On 7/24/2011 11:14 AM, Mehrdad wrote:
 Hi!

 Is 16-bit inline assembly possible with DMD? If not, would it be difficult to
 add the feature?
 That way you might actually be able to write a boot loader in pure D. :)


You can do it with the Digital Mars C compiler!

Adding it to D would be rather complicated and probably not worthwhile.

Mehrdad <wfunction hotmail.com> writes:

On 7/24/2011 12:36 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
 On 7/24/2011 11:14 AM, Mehrdad wrote:
 Hi!

 Is 16-bit inline assembly possible with DMD? If not, would it be 
 difficult to
 add the feature?
 That way you might actually be able to write a boot loader in pure D. :)


 You can do it with the Digital Mars C compiler!

 Adding it to D would be rather complicated and probably not worthwhile.


Omg I didn't know that! I'll give it a try, but then that wouldn't be D, 
haha. It just seems really awesome to be able to build a kernel from 
scratch that doesn't need assembly at all.

But arguably, aside from the awesomeness, there's not much of a reason 
for doing that, so it's totally understandable if it doesn't happen.

Thanks!