digitalmars.D - D compiler assembly
- Brand <Brand_member pathlink.com> May 17 2004
- Mike Swieton <mike swieton.net> May 17 2004
- "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> May 17 2004
- Brand <Brand_member pathlink.com> May 17 2004
- Ilya Minkov <minkov cs.tum.edu> May 18 2004
- Brand <Brand_member pathlink.com> May 18 2004
- "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> May 18 2004
- "Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> Jun 04 2004
- Andrew Edwards <ridimz_at yahoo.dot.com> May 17 2004
Is it possible to make D compiler generate assembly listing? It's pretty annoying to use external disassemblers (such as IDA) for that. And obj2asm mentioned on this site can't be downloaded for free <g>
May 17 2004
On Mon, 17 May 2004 22:21:56 +0000, Brand wrote:And obj2asm mentioned on this site can't be downloaded for free <g>
Umm... yes, it can. It's in the dmd.zip file. Mike Swieton __ Freedom is the right to make the wrong decision.
May 17 2004
"Brand" <Brand_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:c8bdu4$16tq$1 digitaldaemon.com...Is it possible to make D compiler generate assembly listing? It's pretty annoying to use external disassemblers (such as IDA) for that. And obj2asm mentioned on this site can't be downloaded for free <g>
Obj2asm is an extremely useful tool, it's only $15 at www.digitalmars.com/eup.html, comes with a bunch of other very useful tools, and helps keep the monitors glowing at Digital Mars.
May 17 2004
Obj2asm is an extremely useful tool, it's only $15 at www.digitalmars.com/eup.html, comes with a bunch of other very useful tools, and helps keep the monitors glowing at Digital Mars.
too. I was wondering if D compiler will be able to produce assembly listing itself (as do most (if not all) C++ compilers). This feature will greatly help isolating bugs in code generation and should not hit your obj2asm sales much <g>
May 17 2004
Brand schrieb:I agree that this tool is very good. But using any 3rd party disassembler works too. I was wondering if D compiler will be able to produce assembly listing itself (as do most (if not all) C++ compilers). This feature will greatly help isolating bugs in code generation and should not hit your obj2asm sales much <g>
Portable C and C++ compilers like GCC and LCC usually handle assembly as text as their intermediate form, and then pass it to an assembler, which can be either embedded or even external. DigitalMars compilers are different in this respect, that they generate machine code directly without going through assembly. Well, it's no surprise their backends aren't "portable" either. Making the compiler output assembly would essentially mean embedding a disassembler. It doesn't seem Walter would intend to do it, since else he probably would have done it years ago. :) -eye
May 18 2004
Portable C and C++ compilers like GCC and LCC usually handle assembly as text as their intermediate form, and then pass it to an assembler, which can be either embedded or even external. DigitalMars compilers are different in this respect, that they generate machine code directly without going through assembly. Well, it's no surprise their backends aren't "portable" either. Making the compiler output assembly would essentially mean embedding a disassembler. It doesn't seem Walter would intend to do it, since else he probably would have done it years ago. :)
That makes sense, thanks for explanation. Will have to use some 3rd party disassembler then. BTW, are there any benefits in DM approach? Slightly faster compilation time, or something else?
May 18 2004
"Brand" <Brand_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:c8dppa$2260$1 digitaldaemon.com...Portable C and C++ compilers like GCC and LCC usually handle assembly as text as their intermediate form, and then pass it to an assembler, which can be either embedded or even external. DigitalMars compilers are different in this respect, that they generate machine code directly without going through assembly. Well, it's no surprise their backends aren't "portable" either. Making the compiler output assembly would essentially mean embedding a disassembler. It doesn't seem Walter would intend to do it, since else he probably would have done it years ago. :)
BTW, are there any benefits in DM approach? Slightly faster compilation
something else?
If you compare DMC compile speed with gcc, I think that'll be clear enough <g>.
May 18 2004
"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c8e0a8$2d8n$3 digitaldaemon.com..."Brand" <Brand_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:c8dppa$2260$1 digitaldaemon.com...Portable C and C++ compilers like GCC and LCC usually handle assembly as text as their intermediate form, and then pass it to an assembler, which can be either embedded or even external. DigitalMars compilers are different in this respect, that they generate machine code directly without going through assembly. Well, it's no surprise their backends aren't "portable" either. Making the compiler output assembly would essentially mean embedding a disassembler. It doesn't seem Walter would intend to do it, since else he probably would have done it years ago. :)
BTW, are there any benefits in DM approach? Slightly faster compilation
something else?
If you compare DMC compile speed with gcc, I think that'll be clear enough <g>.
You're not kidding, my funky brother!
Jun 04 2004
Brand wrote:Is it possible to make D compiler generate assembly listing? It's pretty annoying to use external disassemblers (such as IDA) for that. And obj2asm mentioned on this site can't be downloaded for free <g>
the ../dmd/bin directory. Unless of course you are using a W$ OS, in which case there is none for M$. Later, Andrew
May 17 2004









Mike Swieton <mike swieton.net> 