digitalmars.D - A few suggestions about the auto keyword
- Dominic M. (32/32) Oct 31 2004 First suggestion :
First suggestion : When reading D's specifications, I could not find wheter local objects declared with the auto keyword get deallocated immediatly when the auto reference to it goes out of scope. Of course, I understand that the destructor get called immediatly, but what about actual memory deallocation ? This question gave me an idea : This could be an option. For I/O bound programs it would be preferable that these objects get deallocated by the garbage collector when the program is waithing for input. For CPU bound programs (like games or real time applications), it would be preferable that they get deallocated immediatly, thus avoiding some gc scanning overhead and shortenig the undesirable pause that will happen when the gc will kick in, most likely while the program is running. Second suggestion : Why limit auto references to local objects only ? For many global references and references owned by a class, it can be safely assumed that they are and will remain the only non-circular reference to the referenced object, or that, at least, all other non-circular references are guaranteed to stop referencing this object before the first(auto) reference would. For non local references, it could be legal to reassing an auto reference. When this would happen, the previously referenced object could be safely deleted automaticaly. This would increase performance for CPU bound programs, because the gc would have less scanning for references to do. Of course, the same result can be achieved by staticaly allocating these objects, but if you forget to use the delete operator, you would end up with a memory leak. For auto references that are part of a class, the referenced object could be deleted automatically not only when the reference is reassigned, but also when the owning object itself get deleted. There could be a restriction on reassigning class owned auto references to avoid logical errors : The new referenced object must have been created by the same instance of the class that will own it. This way, it would prevent putting a reference to an object created outside of the owning instance in an auto reference. This could lead to deleting the object prematurally if the auto reference is reassingned or the owning object is deleted.
Oct 31 2004