digitalmars.D - D.NET 0.101.91
- Deja Augustine <deja scratch-ware.net> Sep 21 2004
- "BUDI ARIEF GUSANDI" <budi online.ie> Sep 21 2004
- Deja Augustine <deja scratch-ware.net> Sep 21 2004
- kinghajj <kinghajj_member pathlink.com> Sep 21 2004
- Deja Augustine <deja scratch-ware.net> Sep 21 2004
- kinghajj <kinghajj_member pathlink.com> Sep 21 2004
- Deja Augustine <deja scratch-ware.net> Sep 21 2004
- Regan Heath <regan netwin.co.nz> Sep 21 2004
Even though it's a relatively minor update, I thought it noteworthy to point out that D.NET's front-end source has been sync'd up to DMD 0.101 A few additional bug fixes warranted a new release with, I'm sure, a plethora of additional minor releases over the next week or so. See http://dnet.scratch-ware.net/ for the most current information on the progress of D.NET -Deja
Sep 21 2004
Wait...i dont understand about version naming here. after 0.9 it's supposed to be 1.0 right ? why is it 0.1 ? Thanks Budi On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 02:49:12 -0500, Deja Augustine <deja scratch-ware.net> wrote:Even though it's a relatively minor update, I thought it noteworthy to point out that D.NET's front-end source has been sync'd up to DMD 0.101 A few additional bug fixes warranted a new release with, I'm sure, a plethora of additional minor releases over the next week or so. See http://dnet.scratch-ware.net/ for the most current information on the progress of D.NET -Deja
Sep 21 2004
Deja Augustine <deja scratch-ware.net> The version scheme for D.NET while it's in the alpha stage is: <dfev>.<ddnv> dfev = D Front-End Version ddnv = D.NET Version Since this latest release is based off of DMD 0.101, the dfev is 0.101 D.NET is at alpha .91 Once D.NET reaches alpha .99, the next major release will be beta .01 (also the version scheme will change a little once D.NET more or less fully implements the D front-end. It will go from <dfev>.<ddnv> to <ddnv>.<dfev> so the first beta will be 0.01.101) Hope that helps a little... there's a method to the madness, though it's still quite mad. -Deja BUDI ARIEF GUSANDI wrote:Wait...i dont understand about version naming here. after 0.9 it's supposed to be 1.0 right ? why is it 0.1 ? Thanks Budi On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 02:49:12 -0500, Deja Augustine <deja scratch-ware.net> wrote:Even though it's a relatively minor update, I thought it noteworthy to point out that D.NET's front-end source has been sync'd up to DMD 0.101 A few additional bug fixes warranted a new release with, I'm sure, a plethora of additional minor releases over the next week or so. See http://dnet.scratch-ware.net/ for the most current information on the progress of D.NET -Deja
Sep 21 2004
In article <ciomdo$o4a$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...Even though it's a relatively minor update, I thought it noteworthy to point out that D.NET's front-end source has been sync'd up to DMD 0.101 A few additional bug fixes warranted a new release with, I'm sure, a plethora of additional minor releases over the next week or so. See http://dnet.scratch-ware.net/ for the most current information on the progress of D.NET -Deja
Is there anything else I need?
Sep 21 2004
kinghajj wrote:In article <ciomdo$o4a$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...Even though it's a relatively minor update, I thought it noteworthy to point out that D.NET's front-end source has been sync'd up to DMD 0.101 A few additional bug fixes warranted a new release with, I'm sure, a plethora of additional minor releases over the next week or so. See http://dnet.scratch-ware.net/ for the most current information on the progress of D.NET -Deja
I installed .NET 2.0 Beta, but I didn't get "MSVCR80D.DLL", only "MSVCR80.DLL". Is there anything else I need?
Does it run? If so, then no :)
Sep 21 2004
In article <cipii7$1aps$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...kinghajj wrote:In article <ciomdo$o4a$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...Even though it's a relatively minor update, I thought it noteworthy to point out that D.NET's front-end source has been sync'd up to DMD 0.101 A few additional bug fixes warranted a new release with, I'm sure, a plethora of additional minor releases over the next week or so. See http://dnet.scratch-ware.net/ for the most current information on the progress of D.NET -Deja
I installed .NET 2.0 Beta, but I didn't get "MSVCR80D.DLL", only "MSVCR80.DLL". Is there anything else I need?
Does it run? If so, then no :)
"MSVCR80D.DLL"! Where did you get your .NET 2.0? Do I need the .NET 2.0 SDK, too?
Sep 21 2004
kinghajj wrote:In article <cipii7$1aps$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...kinghajj wrote:In article <ciomdo$o4a$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...Even though it's a relatively minor update, I thought it noteworthy to point out that D.NET's front-end source has been sync'd up to DMD 0.101 A few additional bug fixes warranted a new release with, I'm sure, a plethora of additional minor releases over the next week or so. See http://dnet.scratch-ware.net/ for the most current information on the progress of D.NET -Deja
I installed .NET 2.0 Beta, but I didn't get "MSVCR80D.DLL", only "MSVCR80.DLL". Is there anything else I need?
Does it run? If so, then no :)
No, it doesn't run, because my setup program for .NET 2.0 didn't install "MSVCR80D.DLL"! Where did you get your .NET 2.0? Do I need the .NET 2.0 SDK, too?
I added msvcr80d.dll to the downloads page, hope it helps.
Sep 21 2004
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:03:06 -0500, Deja Augustine <deja scratch-ware.net> wrote:kinghajj wrote:In article <cipii7$1aps$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...kinghajj wrote:In article <ciomdo$o4a$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...Even though it's a relatively minor update, I thought it noteworthy to point out that D.NET's front-end source has been sync'd up to DMD 0.101 A few additional bug fixes warranted a new release with, I'm sure, a plethora of additional minor releases over the next week or so. See http://dnet.scratch-ware.net/ for the most current information on the progress of D.NET -Deja
I installed .NET 2.0 Beta, but I didn't get "MSVCR80D.DLL", only "MSVCR80.DLL". Is there anything else I need?
Does it run? If so, then no :)
No, it doesn't run, because my setup program for .NET 2.0 didn't install "MSVCR80D.DLL"! Where did you get your .NET 2.0? Do I need the .NET 2.0 SDK, too?
I added msvcr80d.dll to the downloads page, hope it helps.
The difference between "MSVCR80.DLL" and "MSVCR80D.DLL" is the 'D' which might stand for Debug. Did you do a 'complete' install or just the standard one, perhaps you did not install this component? Regan -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Sep 21 2004