• dogtired <dogtired_member pathlink.com> Sep 20 2004
• h3r3tic <h3r3tic dev.null> Sep 20 2004
• Sjoerd van Leent <svanleent wanadoo.nl> Sep 21 2004
• h3r3tic <h3r3tic dev.null> Sep 21 2004
• Sjoerd van Leent <svanleent wanadoo.nl> Sep 21 2004

dogtired <dogtired_member pathlink.com> writes:

I can't find it, neither can dmd.

h3r3tic <h3r3tic dev.null> writes:

dogtired wrote:
 I can't find it, neither can dmd.


Don't. How about std.conv ? :)

Sjoerd van Leent <svanleent wanadoo.nl> writes:

h3r3tic wrote:
 dogtired wrote:
 
 I can't find it, neither can dmd.


 
 Don't. How about std.conv ? :)


std.string, there it is

h3r3tic <h3r3tic dev.null> writes:

Sjoerd van Leent wrote:
 h3r3tic wrote:
 
 dogtired wrote:

 I can't find it, neither can dmd.




 Don't. How about std.conv ? :)


 
 std.string, there it is


std.conv is better :>

Sjoerd van Leent <svanleent wanadoo.nl> writes:

h3r3tic wrote:
 Sjoerd van Leent wrote:
 
 h3r3tic wrote:

 dogtired wrote:

 I can't find it, neither can dmd.





 Don't. How about std.conv ? :)




 std.string, there it is


 
 std.conv is better :>


It is a string function, but I still think the name is odd. It is a C 
name out of the prehistory. I think that /int toInt(char[])/ and /char[] 
toString(int)/ would be more appropriate.

I think it should be in the std.string module since it has to do with 
strings. Although you can argue that it also has to do with other 
variables. :p