digitalmars.D - D.NET 0.95.90 Released
- Deja Augustine <deja scratch-ware.net> Sep 18 2004
- kinghajj <kinghajj_member pathlink.com> Sep 19 2004
- Deja Augustine <deja scratch-ware.net> Sep 19 2004
- kinghajj <kinghajj_member pathlink.com> Sep 19 2004
- "Tu Nam" <dreamweaver mail15.com> Sep 19 2004
- Sjoerd van Leent <svanleent wanadoo.nl> Sep 20 2004
- Deja Augustine <deja scratch-ware.net> Sep 20 2004
- "Lloyd Dupont" <ld NewsAccount.galador.net> Sep 20 2004
Added .NET Properties and Enums as well as squashed a few minor bugs. Today has been a good day for D.NET :) -Deja
Sep 18 2004
In article <ciipd9$lko$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...Added .NET Properties and Enums as well as squashed a few minor bugs. Today has been a good day for D.NET :) -Deja
from Microsoft? Hopefully by the time .NET 2.0 is done, D.NET will be more usefull than it is now.
Sep 19 2004
kinghajj wrote:In article <ciipd9$lko$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...Added .NET Properties and Enums as well as squashed a few minor bugs. Today has been a good day for D.NET :) -Deja
Looks promising :) Unfortunately, I don't have .NET 2.0... can I download a beta from Microsoft? Hopefully by the time .NET 2.0 is done, D.NET will be more usefull than it is now.
Yes, just download the Visual C++ 2005 Express Beta. It comes with the runtimes you need as well as the .NET 2.0 beta -Deja
Sep 19 2004
In article <cilmmp$1v1l$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...kinghajj wrote:In article <ciipd9$lko$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...Added .NET Properties and Enums as well as squashed a few minor bugs. Today has been a good day for D.NET :) -Deja
Looks promising :) Unfortunately, I don't have .NET 2.0... can I download a beta from Microsoft? Hopefully by the time .NET 2.0 is done, D.NET will be more usefull than it is now.
Yes, just download the Visual C++ 2005 Express Beta. It comes with the runtimes you need as well as the .NET 2.0 beta -Deja
Sep 19 2004
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable D.NET use .NET 2.0 ? Why don't compile them for .NET 1.1. Cause in = future just Longhorn can be use .NET 2.0=20 "kinghajj" <kinghajj_member pathlink.com> wrote in message = news:cilqmf$20ng$1 digitaldaemon.com...In article <cilmmp$1v1l$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...kinghajj wrote:In article <ciipd9$lko$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says... =20Added .NET Properties and Enums as well as squashed a few minor =
Today has been a good day for D.NET :) -Deja
Looks promising :) Unfortunately, I don't have .NET 2.0... can I =
from Microsoft? =20 Hopefully by the time .NET 2.0 is done, D.NET will be more usefull =
now. =20 =20
Yes, just download the Visual C++ 2005 Express Beta. It comes with =
runtimes you need as well as the .NET 2.0 beta -Deja
=20
Sep 19 2004
Tu Nam wrote:D.NET use .NET 2.0 ? Why don't compile them for .NET 1.1. Cause in future just Longhorn can be use .NET 2.0
I disagree, .NET 2.0 can be used on Windows XP and I think Mono will make a port again to the Linux (and other) platforms.
Sep 20 2004
Tu Nam wrote:D.NET use .NET 2.0 ? Why don't compile them for .NET 1.1. Cause in future just Longhorn can be use .NET 2.0
D.NET doesn't use anything that's .NET 2.0 specific, but because I compiled it using the VCExpress beta, it bound it to msvcr80d.dll which comes with VCExpress and to .NET 2.0 which also comes with VCExpress. Once D.NET gets close enough for me to release a beta, I'm going to install VS.NET and recompile it to use msvcr70.dll and .NET 1.x -Deja
Sep 20 2004
-Deja
http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/downloads/updates/default.aspx
Sep 20 2004









Sjoerd van Leent <svanleent wanadoo.nl> 