c++.stlsoft - [stlsoft] Bug in pod_vector<T, A, SPACE>::pod_vector(class_type const&
- =?UTF-8?B?Q2hyaXN0aWFuIFLDtnNzZWw=?= (12/12) Aug 08 2008 Hi Matthew,
- Matthew (7/25) Aug 09 2008 Hi Christian
- Matt Wilson (4/22) Aug 11 2008 The release of 1.9.46 takes into account this defect (and several others...
Hi Matthew, the copy-ctor accesses rhs[0] in pod_copy_n(begin_(), &rhs[0], size()); If rhs is empty, we get a "Requested index is out of range" assertion. A possible fix is: if (! rhs.empty()) { pod_copy_n(begin_(), &rhs[0], size()); } Is this workaround sufficcient or do I miss something? I found this bug in 1.9.42 and 1.9.45. Best regards, Christian
Aug 08 2008
Hi Christian I'm working on this right now. The fix is to change line 489 to pod_copy_n(begin_(), rhs.begin_(), size()); This has caused me to finally start the release of the new (1.10+) STLSoft unit-testing facility, which you should see available on the site sometime in the next day or so. Thanks Matt Christian Rössel Wrote:Hi Matthew, the copy-ctor accesses rhs[0] in pod_copy_n(begin_(), &rhs[0], size()); If rhs is empty, we get a "Requested index is out of range" assertion. A possible fix is: if (! rhs.empty()) { pod_copy_n(begin_(), &rhs[0], size()); } Is this workaround sufficcient or do I miss something? I found this bug in 1.9.42 and 1.9.45. Best regards, Christian
Aug 09 2008
The release of 1.9.46 takes into account this defect (and several others). Cheers Matt Christian Rössel Wrote:Hi Matthew, the copy-ctor accesses rhs[0] in pod_copy_n(begin_(), &rhs[0], size()); If rhs is empty, we get a "Requested index is out of range" assertion. A possible fix is: if (! rhs.empty()) { pod_copy_n(begin_(), &rhs[0], size()); } Is this workaround sufficcient or do I miss something? I found this bug in 1.9.42 and 1.9.45. Best regards, Christian
Aug 11 2008