c++.stlsoft - properties_file
- dcw <dogged.code.warrior gmail.com> May 23 2009
- "Matthew Wilson" <matthew hat.stlsoft.dot.org> May 24 2009
Apropos this StackOverflow item - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/874052/properties-file-library-for-c-or-c - is there a major reason why platformstl::properties_file uses basic_string_view, rather than basic_string? My reasons are given in that post. Is it possible to change it so that std::string is the default, and string_view can be had by specialisation?
May 23 2009
Not a bad point. I'll add it to the list Thanks P.S. May I ask how you came to hear about STLSoft, and what you're using it for? "dcw" <dogged.code.warrior gmail.com> wrote in message news:gv9oeu$1cdt$1 digitalmars.com...Apropos this StackOverflow item - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/874052/properties-file-library-for-c-or-c - is there a major
Is it possible to change it so that std::string is the default, and string_view can be had by specialisation?
May 24 2009








"Matthew Wilson" <matthew hat.stlsoft.dot.org>