www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

c++.stlsoft - window_visible_scope

reply "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> writes:
What about window_visible_scope (analogous to window_enable_scope), any
plans for that?
May 21 2004
parent reply "Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:
Hmm. I thought I had that.

Let me plough through all my old Synesis code. ;)

"Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c8m2g0$1h7g$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 What about window_visible_scope (analogous to window_enable_scope), any
 plans for that?

May 21 2004
parent reply "Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:
Here it is! This is not part of beta 8, but will be in the released 1.7.1, which
I think just might be tomorrow. hurrah!

"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message
news:c8mglm$25e1$2 digitaldaemon.com...
 Hmm. I thought I had that.

 Let me plough through all my old Synesis code. ;)

 "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> wrote in message
 news:c8m2g0$1h7g$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 What about window_visible_scope (analogous to window_enable_scope), any
 plans for that?


May 25 2004
next sibling parent "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> writes:
Great! Thanks...
Started using it already!

 Here it is! This is not part of beta 8, but will be in the released 1.7.1,

 I think just might be tomorrow. hurrah!

May 26 2004
prev sibling parent reply "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> writes:
If you don't mind the question...

What's the static_assert about raw_offests for? (in ~window_visible_scope)
I suppose it states that variables should be in the order they were
declared, I just don't get why that would matter or why that would change

 Here it is! This is not part of beta 8, but will be in the released 1.7.1,

 I think just might be tomorrow. hurrah!

May 26 2004
parent "Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:
It's a hack, to allow me to declare members as const, and yet proof myself
against future maintenance "improvements".

I'm going to write a "Flexible C++" thing about it one day, but time, time time
... ;)


"Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c93bku$kaq$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 If you don't mind the question...

 What's the static_assert about raw_offests for? (in ~window_visible_scope)
 I suppose it states that variables should be in the order they were
 declared, I just don't get why that would matter or why that would change

 Here it is! This is not part of beta 8, but will be in the released 1.7.1,

 I think just might be tomorrow. hurrah!


May 26 2004