• James Mansion <James_member pathlink.com> Apr 20 2006
• Arjan <arjan ask.me> Apr 20 2006
• Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.us> Apr 20 2006

Does anyone know if dmc will work with this code (which used to be Rogue Wave
code)?

Its not in the Platforms list, but I wonder if the build infrastructure commited
here http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=349027&view=rev could be adapted.

Anyhow, more variety of template tests is better than less.

Be nice to know if the compiler could handle ntl and the Ultimate++ (upp) code
too.  Not least, upp is a pretty nice IDE and toolset.

James

James Mansion wrote:
 Does anyone know if dmc will work with this code (which used to be Rogue Wave
 code)?


Tools.h++ ?

I have used it in combination with zApp in various projects with DMC 
without problems but that is 2-3 years ago.

I know the recent releases of the compiler (with the new name lookup) 
reported some issues with the version of tools.h++ used in those projects.

I would just give it try.

Arjan

 
 Its not in the Platforms list, but I wonder if the build infrastructure
commited
 here http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=349027&view=rev could be adapted.
 
 Anyhow, more variety of template tests is better than less.
 
 Be nice to know if the compiler could handle ntl and the Ultimate++ (upp) code
 too.  Not least, upp is a pretty nice IDE and toolset.
 
 James
 
 

Tools.h++ indeed used to compile fine DMC++ (and Symantec C++ for that 
matter) they had a focus to be usable with a lot of compilers. I do not 
recall that I had to do a LOT of patching, not even when I worked for 
Rogue Wave for 3+ months to release their latest version of zApp.

With the newer compiler with stricter type-casting and name-lookup you 
might have to patch a couple of things as mentioned by Arjan.

Jan



James Mansion wrote:
 Does anyone know if dmc will work with this code (which used to be Rogue Wave
 code)?
 
 Its not in the Platforms list, but I wonder if the build infrastructure
commited
 here http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=349027&view=rev could be adapted.
 
 Anyhow, more variety of template tests is better than less.
 
 Be nice to know if the compiler could handle ntl and the Ultimate++ (upp) code
 too.  Not least, upp is a pretty nice IDE and toolset.
 
 James
 
 


-- 
ManiaC++
Jan Knepper

But as for me and my household, we shall use Mozilla...
www.mozilla.org