• "Gisle Vanem" <giva bgnett.no> Jul 01 2002
• Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.cc> Jul 02 2002
• "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Jul 02 2002
• Larry Brasfield <larry_brasfield snotmail.com> Jul 02 2002

"Gisle Vanem" <giva bgnett.no> writes:

Is there any #pragma for turning on/off stack-checking?
Like "#pragma off(check_stack)" for Watcom/MSVC.

Gisle V.

Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.cc> writes:

-s switch turns it on, no -s switch leaves it off.



Gisle Vanem wrote:

 Is there any #pragma for turning on/off stack-checking?
 Like "#pragma off(check_stack)" for Watcom/MSVC.

 Gisle V.

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

You can also check the stack for an individual function by calling
_chkstack() upon function entry. -Walter

"Jan Knepper" <jan smartsoft.cc> wrote in message
news:3D21A73A.3A44D55A smartsoft.cc...
 -s switch turns it on, no -s switch leaves it off.



 Gisle Vanem wrote:

 Is there any #pragma for turning on/off stack-checking?
 Like "#pragma off(check_stack)" for Watcom/MSVC.

 Gisle V.

Larry Brasfield <larry_brasfield snotmail.com> writes:

In article <3D21A73A.3A44D55A smartsoft.cc>, 
Jan Knepper (jan smartsoft.cc) says...

[Is there any #pragma for turning on/off stack-checking?]

 -s switch turns it on, no -s switch leaves it off.


Did this ever check for stack overflow as opposed
to doing a stack probe?  I've got a threading
system where it is advantageous (and prudent) to
rewrite the stack overflow checker, but I have not
been able to get it called using -s.

-- 
-Larry Brasfield
(address munged, s/sn/h/ to reply)