Digital Mars - c++.dos - direct screen I/O with disp

Archives

D Programming

D
D.gnu
digitalmars.D
digitalmars.D.bugs
digitalmars.D.dtl
digitalmars.D.dwt
digitalmars.D.announce
digitalmars.D.learn
digitalmars.D.debugger

C/C++ Programming

c++
c++.announce
c++.atl
c++.beta
c++.chat
c++.command-line
c++.dos
c++.dos.16-bits
c++.dos.32-bits
c++.idde
c++.mfc
c++.rtl
c++.stl
c++.stl.hp
c++.stl.port
c++.stl.sgi
c++.stlsoft
c++.windows
c++.windows.16-bits
c++.windows.32-bits
c++.wxwindows

digitalmars.empire
digitalmars.DMDScript

c++.dos - direct screen I/O with disp

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Apr 12 2002

Adrian Cole <Adrian_member pathlink.com> Jun 27 2002

Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.cc> Jun 27 2002

Adrian Cole <Adrian_member pathlink.com> Jun 27 2002

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Jul 01 2002

↑ ↓ ← → "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

I revamped the disp documentation so it is semi-usable now.

www.digitalmars.com/rtl/disp.html

Apr 12 2002

↑ ↓ ← → Adrian Cole <Adrian_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <a983fj$2mim$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
I revamped the disp documentation so it is semi-usable now.

www.digitalmars.com/rtl/disp.html


a solution that was buildable by other compilers, also.

Jun 27 2002

↑ ↓ ← → Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.cc> writes:

 Are the same services available through int86, interrupt 0x10? I'd like to have
 a solution that was buildable by other compilers, also.


#ifdef __DMC__
    // use disp
#else
    // use other.
#endif

Jan

Jun 27 2002

↑ ↓ ← → Adrian Cole <Adrian_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <3D1B6217.BABAB728 smartsoft.cc>, Jan Knepper says...
 Are the same services available through int86, interrupt 0x10? I'd like to have
 a solution that was buildable by other compilers, also.


#ifdef __DMC__
    // use disp
#else
    // use other.
#endif

Jan


instead, because I don't want the nightmare of maintaining changes in two
different places. Your compiler does support embedded assembler, doesn't it?

Jun 27 2002

↑ ↓ ← → "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

"Adrian Cole" <Adrian_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:afftpo$2nq7$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 I take it that means the answer is no. I think I'll just use embedded


 instead, because I don't want the nightmare of maintaining changes in two
 different places. Your compiler does support embedded assembler, doesn't



It sure does!

-Walter

Jul 01 2002