www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

c++.dos - direct screen I/O with disp

reply "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
I revamped the disp documentation so it is semi-usable now.

www.digitalmars.com/rtl/disp.html
Apr 12 2002
parent reply Adrian Cole <Adrian_member pathlink.com> writes:
In article <a983fj$2mim$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
I revamped the disp documentation so it is semi-usable now.

www.digitalmars.com/rtl/disp.html
Are the same services available through int86, interrupt 0x10? I'd like to have a solution that was buildable by other compilers, also.
Jun 27 2002
parent reply Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.cc> writes:
 Are the same services available through int86, interrupt 0x10? I'd like to have
 a solution that was buildable by other compilers, also.
#ifdef __DMC__ // use disp #else // use other. #endif Jan
Jun 27 2002
parent reply Adrian Cole <Adrian_member pathlink.com> writes:
In article <3D1B6217.BABAB728 smartsoft.cc>, Jan Knepper says...
 Are the same services available through int86, interrupt 0x10? I'd like to have
 a solution that was buildable by other compilers, also.
#ifdef __DMC__ // use disp #else // use other. #endif Jan
I take it that means the answer is no. I think I'll just use embedded assembler instead, because I don't want the nightmare of maintaining changes in two different places. Your compiler does support embedded assembler, doesn't it?
Jun 27 2002
parent "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
"Adrian Cole" <Adrian_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:afftpo$2nq7$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 I take it that means the answer is no. I think I'll just use embedded
assembler
 instead, because I don't want the nightmare of maintaining changes in two
 different places. Your compiler does support embedded assembler, doesn't
it? It sure does! -Walter
Jul 01 2002