c++.dos.16-bits - int86 is broken
- "Rajiv Bhagwat" <dataflow vsnl.com> Jan 08 2002
- "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Jan 08 2002
- "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Jan 09 2002
- "Rajiv Bhagwat" <dataflow vsnl.com> Jan 09 2002
- "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Jan 09 2002
- "Rajiv Bhagwat" <dataflow vsnl.com> Jan 09 2002
- "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Jan 10 2002
Please check the following program:
#include <dos.h>
#include <stdio.h>
void use_asm(){
printf("Using asm\n");
asm {
mov ax, 500h
int 2ah
}
printf("Names: %d, Commands: %d, Sessions: %d\n",
_BX, _CX, _DX);
}
int main(){
union REGS InRegs;
InRegs.x.ax = 0;
int active = int86(0x2A, &InRegs, &InRegs) / 256; // Check
Netbios
printf("Active: %d\n", active);
if(active){
InRegs.x.ax = 0x0500; // ah=5, al=0 get NetBIOS
statistics
int86(0x2A, &InRegs, &InRegs);
printf("Names: %d, Commands: %d, Sessions: %d\n",
InRegs.x.bx, InRegs.x.cx, InRegs.x.dx );
use_asm();
}
return 0;
}
Jan 08 2002
"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> At least there's an easy workaround! -Walter "Rajiv Bhagwat" <dataflow vsnl.com> wrote in message news:a1edfd$2e4b$1 digitaldaemon.com...Please check the following program: #include <dos.h> #include <stdio.h> void use_asm(){ printf("Using asm\n"); asm { mov ax, 500h int 2ah } printf("Names: %d, Commands: %d, Sessions: %d\n", _BX, _CX, _DX); } int main(){ union REGS InRegs; InRegs.x.ax = 0; int active = int86(0x2A, &InRegs, &InRegs) / 256; // Check Netbios printf("Active: %d\n", active); if(active){ InRegs.x.ax = 0x0500; // ah=5, al=0 get NetBIOS statistics int86(0x2A, &InRegs, &InRegs); printf("Names: %d, Commands: %d, Sessions: %d\n", InRegs.x.bx, InRegs.x.cx, InRegs.x.dx ); use_asm(); } return 0; }
Jan 08 2002
Here's what I get compiling and running it: ----------------------------------------------- C:\dc>sc -ml test link test/noi; C:\dc>test Active: 1 Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 C:\dc>sc -ms test link test/noi; C:\dc>test Active: 1 Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 C:\dc> ------------------------------------------------------- I can't see what the problem is. -Walter "Rajiv Bhagwat" <dataflow vsnl.com> wrote in message news:a1edfd$2e4b$1 digitaldaemon.com...Please check the following program: #include <dos.h> #include <stdio.h> void use_asm(){ printf("Using asm\n"); asm { mov ax, 500h int 2ah } printf("Names: %d, Commands: %d, Sessions: %d\n", _BX, _CX, _DX); } int main(){ union REGS InRegs; InRegs.x.ax = 0; int active = int86(0x2A, &InRegs, &InRegs) / 256; // Check Netbios printf("Active: %d\n", active); if(active){ InRegs.x.ax = 0x0500; // ah=5, al=0 get NetBIOS statistics int86(0x2A, &InRegs, &InRegs); printf("Names: %d, Commands: %d, Sessions: %d\n", InRegs.x.bx, InRegs.x.cx, InRegs.x.dx ); use_asm(); } return 0; }
Jan 09 2002
With sc -ml test, I get this: Active: 1 Names: 8196, Commands: 31, Sessions: 4623 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 16, Sessions: 64 With sc -ms test, I get: Active: 1 Names: 10872, Commands: 5123, Sessions: 2416 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 16, Sessions: 64 Should I send you .cod (or exe) files? - Rajiv "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:a1isvq$25c1$1 digitaldaemon.com...Here's what I get compiling and running it: ----------------------------------------------- C:\dc>sc -ml test link test/noi; C:\dc>test Active: 1 Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 C:\dc>sc -ms test link test/noi; C:\dc>test Active: 1 Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 C:\dc> ------------------------------------------------------- I can't see what the problem is. -Walter "Rajiv Bhagwat" <dataflow vsnl.com> wrote in message news:a1edfd$2e4b$1 digitaldaemon.com...Please check the following program: #include <dos.h> #include <stdio.h> void use_asm(){ printf("Using asm\n"); asm { mov ax, 500h int 2ah } printf("Names: %d, Commands: %d, Sessions: %d\n", _BX, _CX, _DX); } int main(){ union REGS InRegs; InRegs.x.ax = 0; int active = int86(0x2A, &InRegs, &InRegs) / 256; // Check Netbios printf("Active: %d\n", active); if(active){ InRegs.x.ax = 0x0500; // ah=5, al=0 get NetBIOS statistics int86(0x2A, &InRegs, &InRegs); printf("Names: %d, Commands: %d, Sessions: %d\n", InRegs.x.bx, InRegs.x.cx, InRegs.x.dx ); use_asm(); } return 0; }
Jan 09 2002
What's the date/size on your sds.lib? "Rajiv Bhagwat" <dataflow vsnl.com> wrote in message news:a1j9ov$2cv5$1 digitaldaemon.com...With sc -ml test, I get this: Active: 1 Names: 8196, Commands: 31, Sessions: 4623 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 16, Sessions: 64 With sc -ms test, I get: Active: 1 Names: 10872, Commands: 5123, Sessions: 2416 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 16, Sessions: 64 Should I send you .cod (or exe) files? - Rajiv "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:a1isvq$25c1$1 digitaldaemon.com...Here's what I get compiling and running it: ----------------------------------------------- C:\dc>sc -ml test link test/noi; C:\dc>test Active: 1 Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 C:\dc>sc -ms test link test/noi; C:\dc>test Active: 1 Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 C:\dc> ------------------------------------------------------- I can't see what the problem is. -Walter "Rajiv Bhagwat" <dataflow vsnl.com> wrote in message news:a1edfd$2e4b$1 digitaldaemon.com...Please check the following program: #include <dos.h> #include <stdio.h> void use_asm(){ printf("Using asm\n"); asm { mov ax, 500h int 2ah } printf("Names: %d, Commands: %d, Sessions: %d\n", _BX, _CX, _DX); } int main(){ union REGS InRegs; InRegs.x.ax = 0; int active = int86(0x2A, &InRegs, &InRegs) / 256; // Check Netbios printf("Active: %d\n", active); if(active){ InRegs.x.ax = 0x0500; // ah=5, al=0 get NetBIOS statistics int86(0x2A, &InRegs, &InRegs); printf("Names: %d, Commands: %d, Sessions: %d\n", InRegs.x.bx, InRegs.x.cx, InRegs.x.dx ); use_asm(); } return 0; }
Jan 09 2002
sds lib 370,176 08-04-01 11:10a SDS.LIB snd lib 469,504 07-28-01 1:51a SND.LIB sdc lib 391,168 07-08-01 3:31p SDC.LIB sdl lib 398,848 07-08-01 3:31p SDL.LIB sdm lib 374,272 07-08-01 3:31p SDM.LIB -Rajiv "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:a1jeea$2fg9$1 digitaldaemon.com...What's the date/size on your sds.lib? "Rajiv Bhagwat" <dataflow vsnl.com> wrote in message news:a1j9ov$2cv5$1 digitaldaemon.com...With sc -ml test, I get this: Active: 1 Names: 8196, Commands: 31, Sessions: 4623 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 16, Sessions: 64 With sc -ms test, I get: Active: 1 Names: 10872, Commands: 5123, Sessions: 2416 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 16, Sessions: 64 Should I send you .cod (or exe) files? - Rajiv "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:a1isvq$25c1$1 digitaldaemon.com...Here's what I get compiling and running it: ----------------------------------------------- C:\dc>sc -ml test link test/noi; C:\dc>test Active: 1 Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 C:\dc>sc -ms test link test/noi; C:\dc>test Active: 1 Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 C:\dc> ------------------------------------------------------- I can't see what the problem is. -Walter "Rajiv Bhagwat" <dataflow vsnl.com> wrote in message news:a1edfd$2e4b$1 digitaldaemon.com...Please check the following program: #include <dos.h> #include <stdio.h> void use_asm(){ printf("Using asm\n"); asm { mov ax, 500h int 2ah } printf("Names: %d, Commands: %d, Sessions: %d\n", _BX, _CX, _DX); } int main(){ union REGS InRegs; InRegs.x.ax = 0; int active = int86(0x2A, &InRegs, &InRegs) / 256; //
Netbios printf("Active: %d\n", active); if(active){ InRegs.x.ax = 0x0500; // ah=5, al=0 get NetBIOS statistics int86(0x2A, &InRegs, &InRegs); printf("Names: %d, Commands: %d, Sessions: %d\n", InRegs.x.bx, InRegs.x.cx, InRegs.x.dx ); use_asm(); } return 0; }
Jan 09 2002
Is it possible there are other register values to that function? Not initializing all fields of REGS results in garbage being assigned to them. "Rajiv Bhagwat" <dataflow vsnl.com> wrote in message news:a1jg9u$2gms$1 digitaldaemon.com...sds lib 370,176 08-04-01 11:10a SDS.LIB snd lib 469,504 07-28-01 1:51a SND.LIB sdc lib 391,168 07-08-01 3:31p SDC.LIB sdl lib 398,848 07-08-01 3:31p SDL.LIB sdm lib 374,272 07-08-01 3:31p SDM.LIB -Rajiv "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:a1jeea$2fg9$1 digitaldaemon.com...What's the date/size on your sds.lib? "Rajiv Bhagwat" <dataflow vsnl.com> wrote in message news:a1j9ov$2cv5$1 digitaldaemon.com...With sc -ml test, I get this: Active: 1 Names: 8196, Commands: 31, Sessions: 4623 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 16, Sessions: 64 With sc -ms test, I get: Active: 1 Names: 10872, Commands: 5123, Sessions: 2416 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 16, Sessions: 64 Should I send you .cod (or exe) files? - Rajiv "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:a1isvq$25c1$1 digitaldaemon.com...Here's what I get compiling and running it: ----------------------------------------------- C:\dc>sc -ml test link test/noi; C:\dc>test Active: 1 Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 C:\dc>sc -ms test link test/noi; C:\dc>test Active: 1 Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 Using asm Names: 16, Commands: 128, Sessions: 64 C:\dc> ------------------------------------------------------- I can't see what the problem is. -Walter "Rajiv Bhagwat" <dataflow vsnl.com> wrote in message news:a1edfd$2e4b$1 digitaldaemon.com...Please check the following program: #include <dos.h> #include <stdio.h> void use_asm(){ printf("Using asm\n"); asm { mov ax, 500h int 2ah } printf("Names: %d, Commands: %d, Sessions: %d\n", _BX, _CX, _DX); } int main(){ union REGS InRegs; InRegs.x.ax = 0; int active = int86(0x2A, &InRegs, &InRegs) / 256; //
Netbios printf("Active: %d\n", active); if(active){ InRegs.x.ax = 0x0500; // ah=5, al=0 get
statistics int86(0x2A, &InRegs, &InRegs); printf("Names: %d, Commands: %d, Sessions: %d\n", InRegs.x.bx, InRegs.x.cx, InRegs.x.dx ); use_asm(); } return 0; }
Jan 10 2002