• Mikael Klasson (11/11) Apr 13 2003 Ok, I'm out of ideas here.
• Walter (8/19) Apr 13 2003 try:
• Mikael Klasson (2/4) Apr 13 2003 Oh, ok. Thanks for the quick reply! The support around here rocks. =)
• Walter (5/9) Apr 13 2003 Intel/Microsoft never quite made up their mind how it should look in the

Mikael Klasson <Mikael_member pathlink.com> writes:

Ok, I'm out of ideas here.

fmul	st(0)
^
proth_sieve.cpp(407) : Warning 13: Illegal type/size of operands for the fmul
instruction

Why the warning? I haven't managed to assemble any fpu instruction that uses a
register explicitly.
The "warning" is a bit strange as well. If you look at the generated code, it
actually gets assembled to d8,08 == fmul   dword [eax]. That's quite wrong.

Regards,
Mikael

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

try:
    fmul    st, st(0)

"Mikael Klasson" <Mikael_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:b7cgn3$22uc$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Ok, I'm out of ideas here.

 fmul st(0)
 ^
 proth_sieve.cpp(407) : Warning 13: Illegal type/size of operands for the

fmul
 instruction

 Why the warning? I haven't managed to assemble any fpu instruction that

uses a
 register explicitly.
 The "warning" is a bit strange as well. If you look at the generated code,

it
 actually gets assembled to d8,08 == fmul   dword [eax]. That's quite

wrong.
 Regards,
 Mikael

Mikael Klasson <Mikael_member pathlink.com> writes:

try:
    fmul    st, st(0)

Oh, ok. Thanks for the quick reply! The support around here rocks. =)

Don't you think that's a bit of an odd syntax, though?

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

"Mikael Klasson" <Mikael_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:b7cko8$25a8$1 digitaldaemon.com...
try:
    fmul    st, st(0)

 Oh, ok. Thanks for the quick reply! The support around here rocks. =)

 Don't you think that's a bit of an odd syntax, though?

Intel/Microsoft never quite made up their mind how it should look in the
early days, and that confusion has carried forward. The inline assembler
does just one of the many variants.