c++ - Beta compiler #define
- "Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> Apr 07 2003
- "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Apr 07 2003
- "Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> Apr 07 2003
- "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Apr 07 2003
- "Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> Apr 07 2003
- "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Apr 07 2003
- "Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> Apr 07 2003
Is there a compiler symbol that is defined / not-defined when the compiler is a beta?
Apr 07 2003
"Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:b6rm5b$1bb7$1 digitaldaemon.com...Is there a compiler symbol that is defined / not-defined when the compiler is a beta?
No.
Apr 07 2003
Can we have one? :) "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:b6sjm5$crt$2 digitaldaemon.com..."Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:b6rm5b$1bb7$1 digitaldaemon.com...Is there a compiler symbol that is defined / not-defined when the
is a beta?
No.
Apr 07 2003
I'd rather not. They're supposed to be indistinguishable from the final. "Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:b6ss1c$ji9$1 digitaldaemon.com...Can we have one? :) "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:b6sjm5$crt$2 digitaldaemon.com..."Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:b6rm5b$1bb7$1 digitaldaemon.com...Is there a compiler symbol that is defined / not-defined when the
is a beta?
No.
Apr 07 2003
I guess it'll be ok once the version number is fixed. These things are always a "nice to have" though, and I struggle to see the harm. :). "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:b6ssll$k6s$1 digitaldaemon.com...I'd rather not. They're supposed to be indistinguishable from the final. "Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:b6ss1c$ji9$1 digitaldaemon.com...Can we have one? :) "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:b6sjm5$crt$2 digitaldaemon.com..."Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:b6rm5b$1bb7$1 digitaldaemon.com...Is there a compiler symbol that is defined / not-defined when the
is a beta?
No.
Apr 07 2003
"Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:b6su4a$lfd$1 digitaldaemon.com...I guess it'll be ok once the version number is fixed. These things are always a "nice to have" though, and I struggle to see the harm. :).
The harm is not that in particular, just the endless proliferation of compiler predefines and detritus. There are so many now that are of questionable virtue, but I can't yank them because somebody's build depends on it. I really want to raise the bar that any new ones need to pass.
Apr 07 2003
"Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> Sounds fair enough "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:b6sv49$m3c$2 digitaldaemon.com..."Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:b6su4a$lfd$1 digitaldaemon.com...I guess it'll be ok once the version number is fixed. These things are always a "nice to have" though, and I struggle to see
harm. :).
The harm is not that in particular, just the endless proliferation of compiler predefines and detritus. There are so many now that are of questionable virtue, but I can't yank them because somebody's build
on it. I really want to raise the bar that any new ones need to pass.
Apr 07 2003