c++ - Full Namespace Support Timeframe
- Mark Evans <Mark_member pathlink.com> Oct 07 2002
- Heinz Saathoff <hsaat bre.ipnet.de> Oct 07 2002
- Mark Evans <Mark_member pathlink.com> Oct 08 2002
- "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Oct 07 2002
- "Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> Oct 08 2002
- "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Oct 08 2002
Walter, There are so many projects on which I would deploy DMC++ but can't because they require pieces of Boost and other high-end C++ libraries. There are so many people to whom I recommend DMC++ who then come back at me with the same complaint. DMC++ already has pretty good namespace support. Is it really a bear to get the full-up namespaces in there? What is the hardest part of that work? Do you have a guesstimate on a timeframe? It seems like DMC++ has lots of C99 features that no one uses yet, while still lacking the namespace support that everyone needs. I love the C99 stuff too but the namespace problem is killing me... Mark
Oct 07 2002
Mark Evans schrieb...It seems like DMC++ has lots of C99 features that no one uses yet, while still lacking the namespace support that everyone needs. I love the C99 stuff too but the namespace problem is killing me...
One more: IMO it would make more sense to first concentrate on making DMC++ standard compliant than to spend time in a new D language. - Heinz
Oct 07 2002
D and C++ can help each other. Attracting more users to DMC++ is a simple way to attract more users to D. The quality of the DMC++ compiler is also something that will attract people to D. Mark In article <MPG.180c9c88c80404b39896b2 news.digitalmars.com>, Heinz Saathoff says...One more: IMO it would make more sense to first concentrate on making DMC++ standard compliant than to spend time in a new D language. - Heinz
Oct 08 2002
Sorry about that. I had promised to fix some problems with D first. I don't really know how hard yet it will be to fix all the namespace issues. I did the C99 stuff because they were both easy, nobody else had done them, and some of the back end work needed to be done for D anyway. "Mark Evans" <Mark_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:ant5lf$csa$1 digitaldaemon.com...Walter, There are so many projects on which I would deploy DMC++ but can't because
require pieces of Boost and other high-end C++ libraries. There are so
people to whom I recommend DMC++ who then come back at me with the same complaint. DMC++ already has pretty good namespace support. Is it really a bear to
full-up namespaces in there? What is the hardest part of that work? Do
have a guesstimate on a timeframe? It seems like DMC++ has lots of C99 features that no one uses yet, while
lacking the namespace support that everyone needs. I love the C99 stuff
the namespace problem is killing me... Mark
Oct 07 2002
Am pretty sure its not news, but the lack of member-templates is quite a hassle. In fact, later versions of the compiler seem to work with some member-templates, but not all. I'll narrow this down and post an example. "Mark Evans" <Mark_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:ant5lf$csa$1 digitaldaemon.com...Walter, There are so many projects on which I would deploy DMC++ but can't because
require pieces of Boost and other high-end C++ libraries. There are so
people to whom I recommend DMC++ who then come back at me with the same complaint. DMC++ already has pretty good namespace support. Is it really a bear to
full-up namespaces in there? What is the hardest part of that work? Do
have a guesstimate on a timeframe? It seems like DMC++ has lots of C99 features that no one uses yet, while
lacking the namespace support that everyone needs. I love the C99 stuff
the namespace problem is killing me... Mark
Oct 08 2002
"Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:anullg$218r$1 digitaldaemon.com...Am pretty sure its not news, but the lack of member-templates is quite a hassle. In fact, later versions of the compiler seem to work with some member-templates, but not all. I'll narrow this down and post an example.
8.29 should work with all member templates. I need an example of any bugs.
Oct 08 2002









Mark Evans <Mark_member pathlink.com> 