www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

D.gnu - MinGW-w64 Binaries

reply Daniel Green <venix1 gmail.com> writes:
https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/downloads/gcc-4.5.1-tdm64-1-gdc-r575-20110725.zip

  * Compatible with TDM's 64-bit compiler suite.
  * Binaries are 32-bit.
  * Can generate 32-bit and 64-bit object files.
  * default branch.  DMD 1.067/2.052
  * Contains both D1(default/-v1) and D2(-v2).

See https://bitbucket.org/venix1/mingw-gdc for more information.

Please post any issues on D.gnu or 
https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/issue/206/win64-support
Jul 25 2011
next sibling parent Daniel Green <venix1 gmail.com> writes:
On 7/25/2011 11:45 AM, Daniel Green wrote:

 https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/downloads/gcc-4.5.1-tdm64-1-gdc-r575-20110725.zip



to avoid confusion.

https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/downloads/gcc-4.5.2-tdm64-1-gdc-r575-20110725.zip
Jul 25 2011
prev sibling parent reply Trass3r <un known.com> writes:
   * default branch.  DMD 1.067/2.052
   * Contains both D1(default/-v1) and D2(-v2).



Thx for your work!
Btw the default branch already contains 2.054.
Jul 25 2011
parent reply Daniel Green <venix1 gmail.com> writes:
On 7/25/2011 11:58 AM, Trass3r wrote:

 * default branch. DMD 1.067/2.052
 * Contains both D1(default/-v1) and D2(-v2).



 Thx for your work!
 Btw the default branch already contains 2.054.



The binaries are still 2.052.  Iain just merged the 4.6 branch 
yesterday, which contained 2.054.  I wanted to release 64-bit binaries 
before updating.
Jul 25 2011
parent reply dune <do_not email.com> writes:
Hello,
thanks for compiling this.

BTW: ascii.d is missing from the include directory and the ascii functions are
missing as well.

bye
Jul 26 2011
parent reply Daniel Green <venix1 gmail.com> writes:
On 7/27/2011 12:36 AM, dune wrote:

 BTW: ascii.d is missing from the include directory and the ascii functions are
 missing as well.



DMD 2.052 does not have an ascii.d, it was added later.
Jul 27 2011
parent dune <do-not email.com> writes:
UPS... sorry for that.
Should pay better attention to the version number.

BTW: I think using TDM-GCC is a good choice.
Thanks for your hard work, much appreciated.
Jul 28 2011